The 2004 team was a serious contender. Should've won near 95 games and would've been a very scary playoff team. They just blew it at the end. That was by far our best shot. Injuries and a late season collapse took it away from us. Should have? There was nothing serious about the 2004 team. They were a blip above average. Really? I thought they were an good to very good team on paper. Prior just came off a season which he had a 2.43 ERA and a 1.10 WHIP and was 23 years old Wood had a very nice season as well Zambrano was probably the best #3 in baseball in 2003 and like 21 years old Maddux was a slightly above average pitcher Clement was also solid That starting pitching alone is borderline spectacular, with 3 Cy Young Caliber pitchers, another one (Clement) that would be a #2 or #3 at worse in almost every rotation, and a solid HOF pitcher at the backend of his rotation who had the brains to compensate for his eroding skills. The Bullpen was not very good, but the Lineup had by the end of the season, all starting position players capable of hitting double digits in HR, while 5 of them (Nomar, Sosa, Alou, Lee, Ramirez) had the ability to hit 30 or more HRs with 3-4 of them the ability to hit 40 or more. Sure the OBP was a huge issue, but that lineup was built to hit for power and average, and they did for the most part. What killed the Cubs was their bad bullpen, their lack of OBP, and the unexpected decline of Sammy Sosa. That team had to be a 92-95 win team on paper, it had to.