I think that wins should be a novelty stat that is simply a representation of a team's record when that starter starts. So whether you pitch 0.1 innings and get ejected for throwing at someone with a 5-0 lead, or pitch 12 innings and give up 1 run and lose, you deal with the consequences. What is the point of relievers getting wins and losses? Does any care that Carlos Marmol went 2-4 last year, or do they care about his ERA, WHIP, K/9, BB, etc.? I would only approve of this change if everyone whose anyone in baseball agreed to not place one iota of importance on wins and losses as it pertains to a pitcher's worth. I am pretty sure that people in hockey could care less about W-L for a goalie, and a goalie's W-L might be more indicative of a goalie's value than a pitcher's value (although still with significant flaws). If this was the case, here is how our starter's W-L would be last year Zambrano 18-10 (really 9-7) Harden 13-13 (9-9) Dempster 13-18 (11-9) Wells 14-13 (12-10) Lilly 16-11 (12-9) Marshall 2-7 (2-5) Gorzelanny 4-3 (4-2) Hart 3-1 (3-1) Samardzija 0-2 (0-2)