So if a pitcher goes 2/3 of an inning and gives up 10 runs, and then his team rallies to win 11-10, the starter should get the win rather than another pitcher that held the opposition scoreless for the rest of the game? No way this ever happens, and it shouldn't. Why not? The W-L stat is worthless anyways. There's no way to make it right so just make it as simple as possible, take the reliever getting wins and losses element out of it and simply make it a "record when X starts game" stat, that is a novelty stat and no importance is given to it. If a starter gives up 10 runs in 2/3 of an inning and somehow wins, it balances out for the time he goes 8 innings and gives up 1 run and loses, just like how similar crap happens with the way the stat is calculated now. Basically my true point is that the W-L stat is so useless and stupid it doesn't really matter what they do with it because it will never have any importance on the game of baseball.