I hope he isn't too much like Scott Skiles. Every teams Skiles has coaches grew tired of him within a few years. I don't remember any Bulls players ever reacting to or about Skiles like you're hearing the current ones talk about Thibs. They seem to be totally onboard with his approach to the game. From what I remember, they were early on with Skiles too. But that sort of coaching wears on you. Boers and Bernstein made the point that Phil Jackson learned not to coach every possession. What he's doing is fine this year, but I am worried long term. And I say worried because obviously Tom is a great coach and I want to see him in Chicago long term. Nah, you never heard anything like this with Skiles. Just the basic, perfunctory backing up the coach rhetoric. The other huge difference is how much better a coach Thibs is than Skiles. People got fed up with Skiles because he was a hardass but he wasn't that good a coach. You've also got your key core players, Noah and Rose, on board 100% with Thibs early on in their careers. Skiles is a really really good Xs and Os guy. There really is no debate on that. I've heard major commentator after major commentator rave about that aspect of Skiles. The average fan doesn't recognize it. Yes these Bulls seem to like Thibs better. But I think a lot of that is just due to the success the 10-11 Bulls are experiencing. We'll see how the team responds down the road. Boozer is important to this team. He is just as important as Deng and Noah because he is a key secondary option and we all know the issue Boozer had with Thibs early on (but Thibs was right to take Boozer out for defense late in games).