I heard Dan Bernstein on the radio the other day trying to educate fans on advanced baseball statistics, and was using FIP like it was the king of all pitching statistics. Whoever was with him (not Boers) was noticing that Jimenez wasnt among the top 10 pitchers in FIP and calling the stat out based on that. Dan's response was to defend that damn stat to the death and kept talking about how its more important than anything else you can look at because it's independant of fielding. I was just shaking my head. These stats are great, but people have to understand that there is not one single stat that determines the value or worth of an individual player. Old farts like Boers have to understand that if a new stat doesn't fit your preconceived notions of who's the best, it doesn't mean they're not good. What's the point of judging a new stat solely based on whether it lines up with old school stats? It was not Boers it was Laurence Holmes and he's not old Ok, Holmes is just stupid then.