I don't see why a team does not bid 60 million, give him a 5 year 40 million dollar offer with performance bonuses (relatively easily attainable if he is indeed a top 10 pitcher) that would increase the value to 5 years 80 million. Some set up like this: $8M base salary (his salary in Japan last year was 5 million) + $2M for 200K + $2M for ERA below 3.25 + $2M for 18 W + $2M for WHIP below 1.15 Also make all of the incentives kick in for that season, and every year afterwards automatically. For instance, if Darvish struck out 200 hitters in the first year of his contract he gets the $2m bonus for the entire length of the contract (ie his base would go up to ten). If he fails to have an ERA below 3.25 the first year, but does in year 2, he gets the bonus the last four years. And so on. Structuring the contract like this does two things from the teams perspective. First, it allows an extremely large bid to be placed. Secondly, if he's not a success, then we aren't really worse of if we would have done a lower bid and a larger contract (had it won). Also, one he puts up those numbers it would become obvious that he was the real deal and would have warranted a contract comparable to Cliff Lee or CC Sabathia. From Darvish's perspective he still gets better money than if he stayed in Japan. And, if he hits the bonuses he would make more money than he likely would have gotten in a deal without bonuses. I made the numbers up and the performance marks. You can adjust them accordingly. I don't see why we dont give Japanese players a fair contract that has risk (and upside) built in. It's not like Darvish has a choice to sign with another team. He can go back to Japan for 3 years if he wants to.