Both sides of the rivalry do this. I've seen little to no evidence of this; mainly, because it would be almost impossible for IU fans to do this. I assume you're talking about IU fans wanting to ignore the pre-1940 records (or whatever cut-off date). Well, you can disagree with that logic -- and, frankly, I do too -- but it's not specious. Separating eras into "modern" and "historical/whatever" is not specious and occurs in various settings -- history, politics, music, sports, etc. Pre- and Post-NCAA Tournament -- or whatever cutoff you want here, integration, Bird/Magic game, 64(+) team tournament -- is a logical starting point. It is specious, however, to count games from 1902 but not 1987. There can be no logical rationale for that. Purdue won every game for three years, when that was brought up IU fans would 'point to the banners'. Purdue fans would say... that was nearly 30 years ago... and if you want to bring those up why not talk about the all-time series? Hell, there is a whole generation of IU fans in high shool and college that don't remember IU being a blue blood in anything but name. When do those banners lose some relevance? 40 years after the last championship? 50? Do I think IU will beat Purdue for the foreseeable future as someone suggested? Nope. Next year, assuming Zeller stays it will be difficult for Purdue to win one. After Zeller is gone things will be more even, based on the 2012/2013 recruiting classes. I also think Tom Crean is an embarrasment to humanity. Compare him to other blue blood coaches in appearance and public behavior.