It's always like this. IU fans can't mention their "dusty banners" because 1987 is too remote in time. However, stuff that happened before World War 2, before the NCAA Tournament even existed, is not too remote in time. Haha, and the dusty banners count, but the dusty old wins and conference championships don't... In head to head competition and conference competition Purdue has been more succesful. In postseason tournament competition IU has been more succesful. That's what it boils down to. I still say Tom Crean as the face of IU basketball is an embarassment. Smack is pushing hard for honorary "Bum" status. Seriously, no sane fan would trade IU's success for Purdue's. What? Obviously I would be happy if Purdue had more championships than IU.