Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Aaron_Kennelly

Verified Member
  • Posts

    11,482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Aaron_Kennelly

  1. I'm sorry. http://www.northsidebaseball.com/articles/cubs-articles/57-is-jason-heyward-fixed
  2. http://www.northsidebaseball.com/articles/cubs-articles/57-is-jason-heyward-fixed
  3. It's become a yearly tradition. Some blustery winter day a couple months after the baseball season is over, we see new footage of the swing changes Jason Heyward has been working on. Everyone argues over if the swing looks any better, what's wrong with it, and, actually, if it's changed at all. The season starts. Eventually there are signs of promise. Everything goes downhill from there. We all agree to never speak of Heyward being fixed again. The next season starts. Heyward goes on a tear for a week or two, and, inevitably, people proclaim that Heyward is fixed. Does it ever work out for those people? http://www.patricialadd.com/wp-content/uploads/itmightwork-424x480.png Full disclosure: I'm one of those stooges who thought Heyward was fixed at one point. On this date last year, Heyward was hitting .294/.342/.456. His swing didn't look much different. But it seemed like he might be fixed. He didn't do anything like that in 2016. He was just bad. All year. The main reason I thought Heyward might have been fixed was because he was hitting the ball hard. Heyward's case wasn't like what we're seeing with Ian Happ right now -- when a batter seemingly forgets how to do anything right at the plate. During Heyward's worst moments, he maintained a keen eye at the plate. He was still making contact at a very high rate. Contrary to popular belief, he didn't really have a problem with hitting too many ground balls. His GB% was lower in '16 and '17 than his career rate. Bad Heyward couldn't hit the ball hard, though. In 2015, Heyward had an average exit velocity of 89.3 mph. It dropped to 86.6 mph in 2016. So when I saw Heyward had an average exit velocity of 90.1 mph in April last year, I grew hopeful. It didn't last. Heyward finished 2017 with an average exit velocity of 86.4 mph. Heyward was basically the same as he was in 2016. To be fair, compared to his disastrous 2016, Heyward did improve some at the plate in 2017. I don't think he was really any better, but he probably was a little unlucky in 2016 -- as evidenced by his .266 BABIP. Heyward's wRC+ went up from 71 in '16 to 88 in '17. Even still, that's not good. So here we are on April 24 again. Heyward's putting up good numbers at the plate. His average exit velocity is 90.4 mph. Time is a flat circle. Am I going to be fooled again this time around? Nope. No. No. No. But maybe... Let's go back to last year when Heyward was hitting the ball hard and putting up good numbers. Despite what happened the rest of the year, I do think he was somewhat fixed at that point in time. He was hitting the ball hard and producing at the plate, after all. He couldn't do that at all in 2016. Maybe fixed isn't the right word. But Heyward found a way to be useful again. The problem is that it didn't stick. And if he is fixed again, it might not stick this time either. Keep that in mind for the rest of this article and the rest of Heyward's time in a Cubs uniform. He might be fixed at some point. But we've seen enough of the broken version of Heyward to always be weary that he won't stay fixed for long. Why did Heyward go from being fixed to not last year? Who knows? I think the main culprit might have been the sprained finger that sent him to the DL on May 8. It was a minor injury that shouldn't have affected him after he got back. But I think the time off snapped him out of the rhythm he'd developed at the plate. Before long, he fell back into the same bad habits at the plate. Bad Heyward was back for good. Or he could have never been fixed at all. That's always a possibility. We shouldn't ever read much out of small sample sizes. Remember that, too. There's some different going on with Heyward this time around, though. If you've followed the Cubs at all the past few years, you probably know that Heyward has had problems dealing with velocity inside. Pitchers quickly found out that it was easy to get Heyward out by throwing fastballs in on his hands. Here is the heatmap for all four-seam fastballs thrown to Heyward from right-handed pitchers last year. That's unusual. Sure, pitchers will work inside sometimes. But the inner half is where most hitters look for pitches to drive. It's much easier to pull the ball in the air when it's on the inside. If you are a left-handed hitter and pitchers can succeed by attacking you with pitches inside, you're going to have some problems. Here are Joey Votto's and Matt Carpenter's heatmaps on four-seam fastballs from right-handed pitchers last year. Joey Votto is impossible to face. There's nothing you can do. Carpenter's heatmap looks like how you'd expect a lot of lefties to be attacked. Stay away from his power. Work the outside edge. With Heyward, sure, you could work outside where he can't get to his power. But why not just work inside if he's even worse there? And Heyward most certainly was worse on pitches on the inside. Consider this: On all pitches on either the outside third or center third of the plate last year, Heyward slugged .512. The league average for left-handed batters was .509. On pitches on the inside third, Heyward slugged .293 last year. The league average for left-handed batters was .492. Between 2016 and 2017, Heyward's average exit velocity on pitches on the outer third was 91.0 mph. On pitches over the center of the plate, his average exit velocity was 90.2 mph. On pitches over the inner third, his average exit velocity was -- gulp -- 82.5 mph. Heyward clearly had trouble with pitches on the inside and was rightfully exploited by pitchers because of it. Going back to last April, when Heyward was putting up big numbers and hitting the ball hard, he only slugged .294 and had an average exit velocity of 85.6 mph on pitches on the inner third for the month. This lends credence to the notion that Heyward was never fixed last year and that we were just seeing noise from a small sample size. The solution this off-season? Scoot back from the plate. It can't be that easy, can it? Maybe so. Here is a screengrab from Heyward in the batter's box last year. This one comes from earlier this year. When we got a glimpse of Heyward's off-season adjustments, his swing looked much the same as we'd always seen. The actual games started and it was obvious that he was standing as far away from the plate as he possibly could. That's an actual change. How's it working out for him so far? Pretty good! Heyward's still hitting the ball hard when it's over the center third, with an average exit velocity of 91.1 mph. Despite standing so far away from the plate, he's actually hitting the ball harder when it's on the outer third, at 94.6 mph. As for the inner third? Heyward's average exit velocity is 91.1 mph there. He's slugging .643 on pitches on the inner third! In 2017, Heyward had 6 batted balls with an exit velocity of at least 100 mph on pitches on the inner third. He's already matched that total this year. Seriously, could it be this simple? I really don't know. Again, I'd caution against reading too much into small sample sizes. But this is definitely intriguing. Heyward had one fatal flaw in 2016 and 2017. He couldn't hit pitches on the inner third. He responded by backing off the plate so pitchers couldn't attack him in on his hands. Since doing so, the inner third hasn't been a problem for him. One of the reasons I think this idea might be crazy enough to work is that it wasn't just velocity inside that was hurting Heyward. In 2016 and 2017, he slugged .146 on off-speed pitches on the inner third. His exit velocity on such pitches was 78.5 mph. This wasn't just a funk for Heyward. This was a problem that was going to capsize his career. He couldn't hit inside pitches and pitchers knew it. Something had to change. Perhaps this was the answer all along. If simply backing off of the plate transformed Jason Heyward from Kolten Wong into Christian Yelich, there's only one logical conclusion to be had (courtesy of NSBB forum user TBS Playoffs Insider):
  4. Yeah, I'm not even going to bother reading it to get the gist of the article. However, if we want to get real meatbally, as I'm sure our good friend Rick did... Willson is a World Series champion and Yu isn't. Wouldn't Willson be in a perfect position to communicate the culture of winning to Yu?
  5. Imagine Javy playing in Coors, not only being Javy but also having opposing pitchers not being able to throw breaking stuff like they're used to.
  6. Did he wear a condom?
  7. That's too bad. The last time LeBron saw us, things worked out pretty well.
  8. I knew it had been bad for Justin Grimm, but I didn't know he'd been relegated to Rockies' social media guy.
  9. I'll bet my entire life savings on Cubs vs. Giants.
  10. The best news is that they get a day off for their bodies to recalibrate upon their return to the Earth's gravity.
  11. I think he might be better than Happ defensively.
  12. It literally took a ball to drop that’s caught 99.99999999% of the time for the 4 ERs to happen. If that doesn’t happen he likely goes long since his pitch count is way down and the lead is bigger. I guess I'd be curious as to when you think a Cubs starter has actually stunk this year, or if there are always mitigating circumstances. "Just one bad inning, just a bunch of weak contact, etc., etc.." He walked 1 and struck out 7. He got 12 swinging strikes in 83 pitches. He gave up a homer on a ball with a 94 mph exit velocity. And 2 runs scored on a routine fly ball that was dropped. He was pitching in Coors on a weekend when like 75 runs have been scored. The Cubs have been up by multiple runs all day since the top of the 1st inning.
  13. Yeah, it was a real moral victory or something. I think they just call it a victory when you win.
  14. Guys: 1) we're playing at Coors. 2) Q and Yu have been excellent for like 2,000 inning combined. A handful of starts doesn't outweigh that.
  15. A look at Jason Heyward when he gets home: http://images.amcnetworks.com/amc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/better-call-saul-season-2-episode-210-bob-odenkirk-jimmy-mcgill-micheal-mckean-chuck-mcgill-1200x658.jpg
  16. I can't believe all it took for Heyward to get fixed at the plate was him going legally blind.
  17. I could be wrong. Sometimes Aaron Judge turns into Aaron Judge. But if I'm betting on an all-bat guy with huge raw power, I'm going to look for a young guy that is putting up Giancarlo Stanton-like numbers in the minors. Eloy just doesn't impress me that much. I think Eloy will be a good hitter. I think he'll give the White Sox some nice value. But I don't think he'll be a guy I'll be yearning to have. I think he's going to strike out a little too much, probably not walk enough, and definitely not play defense well enough for him to be an elite-level player. But he might turn into Aaron Judge.
  18. Not as well as everyone thought he'd be doing. No one was comping Mazara to Miguel Cabrera. I mean that comp is ridiculous for any prospect, but some scout/exec said that about Eloy's ceiling. I'm a big fan of Eloy and think posters here are underrating him. I like him way more than I ever liked Soler. Whoever is comparing prospects to Miguel Cabrera is being ridiculous, so I don't see why that random comp really matters. But Mazara was very highly thought of a couple years ago. Maybe a little below Eloy's level, but both were viewed as top-5 to top-10 prospects. Eloy was a little higher, mostly on the top-5 side. My main point, though, is that they are both huge individuals that aren't really that athletic and won't provide value on defense or on the bases. Everyone thought Mazara's bat was a sure thing, like Eloy's, despite both having some swing-and-miss and not really walking much. Eloy is going to have to hit the horsefeathers out of the ball to accrue much value. He hasn't really shown me enough for me to think that's a sure thing. I think he can hit and hit well, but I don't think he'll be all that great of an all-around player. Eloy's also had some injuries problems already. And that doesn't really portend good vibes for his health as he gets older, with his bigass body.
  19. I'm pretty confident in saying Eloy will be better than Nomar Mazara. I have no idea how Mazara is doing right now lol. Not as well as everyone thought he'd be doing.
  20. I would have said Jorge, but he's not that sexy.
  21. Eloy is the second-coming of Nomar Mazara.
  22. Also a stark contrast between how unsexy last year was. Man, he was so fucked up. Be my big, sexy dongsmith and not that other guy, Kyle.
×
×
  • Create New...