Jump to content
North Side Baseball

soapy

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,601

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by soapy

  1. soapy
    I think you know the answer to that question, Vance. Dusty
  2. soapy
    If he's getting three years, I'd likely pass. I could definitely think of worse options though (Neifi).
  3. soapy
    If Walker is gone, he wouldn't be a bad option in the #2 spot. He could also sub for Ramirez at 3B when necessary. Having said that, I haven't paid much attention to what kind of offers he's been getting. I saw Pittsburgh was after him, but that's about all I saw. I'd have to consider that of course.
  4. soapy
    Especially when you consider that the Cubs are seemingly dying to trade Walker, Cedeno/Neifi could be abysmal at SS (especially if they both have to start at 2B/SS), and Lee probably won't put up the numbers he had last year. Hopefully Ramirez can stay healthy. Even with the upgrade in LF and CF, the offense overall really could be worse in 2006.
  5. soapy
    defense. but I agree with you. terrible idea.
  6. soapy
    What really will be enjoyable will be the days that Neifi and Mabry start for Cedeno and Murton. Also known as weekdays, right? Correct. Also, you can't expect the two rooks to do well against RHP just because they did in the minor leagues. They'll need to rest against RHP. I look for this lineup: Pierre Perez Lee Ramirez Jones Barrett Mabry Hairston Awesome...
  7. soapy
    What really will be enjoyable will be the days that Neifi and Mabry start for Cedeno and Murton.
  8. soapy
    The other possibility is that they throw Freel in the OF making Kearns, Griffey or Pena (or an outstide chance, Dunn) available.
  9. soapy
    I prefer a little from column A and a little from column B. He's not saying that they currently have interest in Jones, but just having him as a possibility makes my head hurt. Since Hendry didn't land Furcal, he isn't ruling out any more free agent signings. I read the bolded part above as 'gawd knows were not done yet, but we think further acquisitions will come via trade' I agree. And Jon, I agree that even Hendry saying that he's EVER considered J. Jones a possibility is scary. I said at the beginning of this offseason that my nightmare scenario was Jones in RF, and it still is. I'm just hoping Hendry isn't interested at this point. I think he has to know (please, God) that he needs a bat out there, not a glove.
  10. soapy
    I seem to be reading this differently than you guys. It sounds to me like Hendry is saying, "We had interest in the past. But, we're not really into the free agent market right now." i.e. we're not interested. Or maybe I'm drunk. You decide.
  11. soapy
    You know what I bet happens: Not what you said. :wink:
  12. soapy
    I think the 40 page Bobby Howry thread was out of control. There have been hundreds (guess) of pages on Dunn with no basis for fact. How is this any different? In any case, none of it has any bearing on what actually happens, so what difference does it make? I apologize if that's not what you are getting at nolan, but I'm getting a little tired of hearing people say "Don't propose Dunn trades, it will never happen." So what? Who cares? This is an interesting philosophical discussion so whether it could happen or not is pretty irrelevant. I just think these threads are an excuse for members to argue with each other for absolutely no reason cause he won't be a cub. If you want to argue, argue about REAL POTENTIAL MOVES, OR MOVES WEVE ALREADY MADE. What what do you want me to do, work? Now that's just foolish. I really don't see the big deal. In fact, it's one of the things I like about this board (the in depth analysis and arguement about something that will probably never happen). It's interesting for me to read, and sometimes, participate in.
  13. soapy
    I hate the NCAA, hypocritical pricks. I have no love for UK, but that is BS on the part of the NCAA. They should just get rid of the "test the waters" rule altogether IMO.
  14. soapy
    I think you can work out a way to get all three OF (Murton, Floyd, Bradley) their fair share of PA. I'm not saying that Murton hasn't "earned" a starting chance, but why leave him as the only option. He's a risk too. At least if you have Floyd, Bradley and Murton, you have some insurance if someone gets injured, "goes off the deep end" or whatever. You might be able maximize both Floyd's and Murton's potential with a platoon. I'm certainly not against Murton being the full time LF, but why not add in Floyd if you can? Let's say you start with Murton in LF and Mabry is your 4th OF. What do you think is going to happen if Murton has a bad April and/or just has an overall slight sophmore slump? Hello John Mabry in LF. :pukel:
  15. soapy
    Mets? They could move Reyes to 2B (again). As I prefaced my comments, the list isn't comprehensive. Yeah, I know. I just thought I'd throw them out there. They seem to be after everybody else. Did they sign Grudz yet? If so, it probably makes that less likely. Unless they trade Reyes to get Tejada.
  16. soapy
    I think Dusty might platoon Murton with someone like Floyd. Floyd's splits are pretty extreme and Dusty did play Murton usually against LHP last year. I'd love to see a Floyd/Murton platoon in LF with Bradley in RF. Especially if it can be done without giving up Walker. I think (as has been mentioned by others) you can get each about 400-500 PA over the length of the season.
  17. soapy
    Mets? They could move Reyes to 2B (again).
  18. soapy
    I was firmly in the "Sign Bradley" camp before we acquired a CF (albeit a CF that is inferior to Bradley). Bradley would have been a significant asset as a CF. But (1) I think it's naive to say that his purported attitude problems are not a risk; (2) Bradley isn't be anything more than a league average RF, at best; and (3) in light of 1 and 2, he's not really worth the risk. While (1) and (2) are certainly true, he's likely one of the best options left for the Cubs at this point. Unless you think they can get Dunn or Abreu (I personally don't).
  19. soapy
    If they trade Walker, I agree it's not enough. If they keep Walker, I think it is. Having said that, I'd gladly take Floyd and Bradley in the corners with Murton as the 4th OF (and starting for Floyd against LHP).
  20. soapy
    I'm resurrecting this thread because I'm starting to think it's the most logical route at this point. I'm assuming that Texas is going to shop some of their excess OF at this point. I'm also interested in what's going to happen in NY (Manny or no Manny?). I think a platoon of Floyd and Mench in RF could be pretty damn productive. Floyd had a .915 OPS against RHP in 2005. .910 from 2002-2004. Mench had a .980 OPS against LHP in 2005. .984 from 2002-2004. Add into that whoever doesn't start is your first PH off the bench and you may be on to something. The question is, can you make these moves without losing Walker? If so, I think it's a great option.
  21. soapy
    Please, show me the evidence that Pierre is better than Wilkerson. Not taking the bait. I've made my statement. I'll quote numbers and then you'll tell me they don't mean anything and then you'll quote numbers and tell me why they prove Wilkerson is better. Blah blah blah blah. We went through this yesterday regarding Soriano and Walker when you misrepresented some numbers about their difference in OBP. Then we talked about it regarding Wilkerson and Pierre when you initially said Pierre was superior only in stolen bases and then admitted he had better numbers in other categories. It comes down to opinion, and my is as valuable as yours. And judging from your user name, maybe you don't have such a good history of evaluating players. What's the point of that?
  22. soapy
    Hello hyperbole. It's fine that you think Pierre is better than Wilkerson (obviously), but I think it's ridiculous for you to say that there is "no arguement" IMO. Of course there is an arguement. Wilkerson is superior in some catagories and Pierre is superior in some catagories. There is most difinitley and agruement. I also disagree with your "I'm not paying them" arguement. Guess what, you aren't paying them, but the Cubs are (or would be if they got them). Like it or not, the Cubs have a budget. Look at it this way, would you rather have Pierre + Soriano + a weak RF or Walker + Wilkerson + a significant bat in RF? Because you are probably going to spend about the same amount of money on those two scenarios. I personally choose the second option. If you choose the first, fine. But don't tell me there's "no arguement" because there sure as hell is.
  23. soapy
    I wouldn't be completely satisfied with that, but I could maybe live with it I guess. Probably leaves you a good chunk of change to get another SP or upgrade mid-season. The down side; it's a risky lineup. One that a team spending $100 million shouldn't have to take. If Bradley flips out and/or Murton tanks (both are very possible), you are in trouble. Pierre Walker Lee Ramirez Bradley Murton Barrett Cedeno/Neifi If the Cubs go that route, they sure as hell better upgrade in the 4th OF department.
  24. soapy
    Not necessarily. I wouldn't rule out Jerry Hairston yet as the everyday 2B if Walker is dealt. I would rule that out. Dusty playing Hairston over Neifi. There is no freakin' way. Maybe Hairston can start at second if Neifi is at SS. Yay. Hairston will be the Cubs 4th or 5th OF. If he's still on the team. I wouldn't be surprised if he got traded. Maybe along with Patterson for Bradley. Or maybe that's just my hope so that Walker is kept.
  25. soapy
    Not necessarily. I wouldn't rule out Jerry Hairston yet as the everyday 2B if Walker is dealt. I would rule that out. Dusty playing Hairston over Neifi. There is no freakin' way. Maybe Hairston can start at second if Neifi is at SS. Yay.
×
×
  • Create New...