Joe's money is still the primary money behind the Cubs. He is not involved with the team, but the kids had to get his blessing to make this purchase for the family. It has been completely overblown by the media and the politicians are seizing the opportunity to scold a 1%er, but that's all to be expected. Joe Ricketts does not like the way the "wasteful way" in which the federal government spends it's money. Joe Ricketts thinks Mr. Obama is at the forefront of all this wasteful spending. Joe Ricketts thinks in order to get Mr. Obama out of the White House, he has to form a super-pac and start an ad campaign showing Mr. Obama to be someone who is not fit for the office of the President because of his ties to a black minister. Joe Ricketts children own and operate the Chicago Cubs. The Chicago Cubs are asking for government money (albeit local and not federal dollars) to renovate Wrigley Field. Therefore, it's hypocritical of the Cubs to be asking for government money that many would view (perhaps even Joe Ricketts) as a "wasteful way" for the government to spend it's money. Quite a jump at the end there, but bigger and way crazier leaps in logic are made in politics every minute of the day. Edited to correct typo. The thing with the Wrigley renovations though is that it's not the Government "spending" money, if it's structured right the direct money they issue will be an investment for the city/state and they should see returns. If they issue bonds and/or loaned money to the Cubs they will eventually receive their principal back + interest, the entertainment tax or whatever Tom wants to tap into is already in place so it's no more added taxes just shifting of who gets it (and let's no fool ourselves here if that tax is already in place it's going to continue to exist even if it is set to expire sometime soon they will find a way to extend it). Plus with Wrigley renovations you have all the indirect benefits of the direct investment, conceivably you add jobs, increase payroll/income tax collection, lower unemployment, people employed by the projects will have more money to spend elsewhere, taxes will be collected on goods/services bought for the projects, Wrigley/added buildings/surrounding buildings would likely see their value increase which would mean added property tax is collected, the first few years of a renovation would likely see more people visiting Wrigley/surrounding area which likely would mean more money being put into the local economy there through Wrigley/Bars/Restaurants/Shops (state/city would be able to collect the sales tax that comes out of that).