First major league start of his career, with little notice, against the team with the best record in baseball, he pitches a shutout through 4 innings, and that's a BAD start? What planet are you from? He didn't pitch a shutout through four, and on the planet I'm from, the fifth inning of a major-league baseball game also counts. I'm willing to give him some credit for the fact that Fox let in inherited runners. Gallagher left the game with the bases loaded and one out, a situation that on average leads to 1.61 runs being scored, so I'll say Gallagher gave up 3.61 runs in 4 1/3 innings. That's an ERA of 7.50. There are no circumstances under which that can be called "good" outside of maybe Coors Field in a hurricane. And I notice that people pointing out the circumstances don't ever mention that the wind was howling in as well. A 7.50 ERA with the wind blowing in? Never good. There were encouraging signs, certainly, and I like that he's getting another start, but it wasn't good. I forgot about the first inning run. That aside I wasn't saying that it was a great start, just that it wasn't a bad start (like you said it was). Not everything is either good or bad; there's some middle ground, and I think that's where the start was.