Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. If there is one thing that is disapointingly-declined more often than online gambling propositions, it's online fight propositions. I've been involved in multiple versions of both. None of them ever come to fruition, largely because the people proposing them are loud-mouthed blowhards with no intention of following through. You have no idea what I'm talking about
  2. "Slightly crossed over" is a TD That image from barstool is hardly the best look. Finding a better image is fruitless at this point, but it broke the plane The point is that it was called short on the field and replay rules have always been “clear and obvious evidence needed to overturn”. Based on the reviews I saw, I don’t think it’s clear and obvious at all. You're not correct about that. There was a view that showed the nose of the ball over the goal line live, they talked about it on air. It doesn't really matter at this point. The refs chose differently
  3. I agree, I didn't understand why Bears fans were flipping out over that call. It may have slightly crossed over, but no way they are changing the call with the reviews we saw IMO. Bears fans should focus their ire on lining up in shotgun for a 1 inch sneak. "Slightly crossed over" is a TD That image from barstool is hardly the best look. Finding a better image is fruitless at this point, but it broke the plane
  4. Fields has show more than just the occasional big play, he continues to hold on to ball, he's making bad reads, I don't care who his WR are, he's still making horsefeathers reads. What if Mike Martz is right? About Lance?
  5. Guys I'm telling you the only way we can feel good about the bears is if they are crippling opposing QBs horsefeathers offense
  6. We need a fight club Badly
  7. Who does he have to play with?
  8. The 80s were a cool time. Lynn Dickey getting crushed by the Fridge Charles Martin will always sit poorly with me
  9. Objectively, you're blind I'm not convinced. Ok David
  10. Objectively, you're blind
  11. "We can't tell from video.." Video shows ball nose 4" past goaline horsefeathers nfl refs
  12. That may have been good
  13. This offense has no talent save Fields
  14. SF isn't that good, at least not with Lance at QB. Lance is bad
  15. If I look at the schedule and think we will be 1-1 I feel hopeful If I watch this game I feel jerseyfan was 100% right and David is an idiot I'm leaning to the latter. The lack of offensive talent sucks
  16. HAHAHAHAHA
  17. No, they need the O to put up points. GB doesn't have a WR to speak of
  18. his analysis is believable, I can't deny that. but if you close your eyes to the video, it's easy to think he's talking about soccer. I guess I'm not up to speed with how popular the NFL is in England..or English....or for ex-patriot British living in the US also...anyone else nervous for tonight? I desperately want the Bears to win this Anectodally, a Bears message board I post on has two or three long time Brits who became Bears fans in the 80s. I think it's always had its niche for fans, but the access to tape and info allows a very dedicated person to close the technical knowledge gap in the past decade (in a way a 80s or 90s English person couldn't). I get it. I don't disagree with anything he's presenting, his accent just threw me for a loop
  19. That was horseshit
  20. He's better to listen to than most if these YouTube film guys. I like how he points out the holds, which happen on every play and refs just call them at their leisure. But this fellow is like hmmmm isn’t that holding? Why yes. Yes it is. his analysis is believable, I can't deny that. but if you close your eyes to the video, it's easy to think he's talking about soccer. I guess I'm not up to speed with how popular the NFL is in England..or English....or for ex-patriot British living in the US also...anyone else nervous for tonight? I desperately want the Bears to win this
  21. The British accent throws me off
  22. what made the Pettis TD special is 1) Pettis just sat down in the zone when the play blew up while the other WR's kept moving and 2) Fields athletic ability to avoid getting tackled, pivot and play catch with Pettis. They both really deserve a lot of credit for how they handled the break down. Fields lobbed that throw....all Pettis had to do was get under it, but credit Fields for finding him. i do think Fields locks on to receivers and holds the ball more then I'd like, but I also feel that is something he can grow out of with more playing time and learning defenses as well as his own offense. He doesn't seem to linger as long as he did last year, at least that's my impression from last Sunday and the last preseason game Nitpicky but Pettis didn't exactly sit down in the end zone... he found a wide open window when the DBs near him started cheating towards Fields anticipating a scramble. It was a defensive breakdown but he did a good job recognizing that and finding an open spot. Also he caught it at the 30 and made a pretty nice run with minimal blocking to get into the end zone so he had to do more than just get under the ball and catch it. Pettis did exactly what he should have done, when the play broke down he sat in a part of the field that left him wide open. is that better? but I think they were playing a zone defense......nitpicky or not
  23. what made the Pettis TD special is 1) Pettis just sat down in the zone when the play blew up while the other WR's kept moving and 2) Fields athletic ability to avoid getting tackled, pivot and play catch with Pettis. They both really deserve a lot of credit for how they handled the break down. Fields lobbed that throw....all Pettis had to do was get under it, but credit Fields for finding him. i do think Fields locks on to receivers and holds the ball more then I'd like, but I also feel that is something he can grow out of with more playing time and learning defenses as well as his own offense. He doesn't seem to linger as long as he did last year, at least that's my impression from last Sunday and the last preseason game
  24. Lol we swept the Mets
  25. and bote but bote sucks
×
×
  • Create New...