Derwood
-
Posts
87,647 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
80
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Derwood
-
The biggest positive of this story is that Orr is now a nationally known jackass who is being called an idiot by every talking head in radio and TV
-
Draft websites have him anywhere from 85ish to 115ish overall, and between the 9th to 12th best DE
-
Relevant http://www.theonion.com/video/russia-applauds-americas-efforts-to-exclude-gay-at,35181/
-
seems silly to project this team 8 years out
-
Congrats, you're now tied with the pooptacular Nittany Lions
-
That's even cooler than I imagined
-
I like that Clark still has Soriano's hands
-
2014 Winter Olympics (Beware, no spoiler tags)
Derwood replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Other Sports
I've only watched the last 15 minutes or so.....has it all been this bad? Because this is really bad -
Ducks were "unstoppable" at home, but have now dropped 2 straight (CBJ and CHI)
-
ends up being $135 million. largest contract in Braves history
-
I was partial to Eduardo's when I lived there
-
you act like you're surprised every single game. it's always awful, so the good teams gameplan for it. if the refs are going to let you flop, flop like crazy good games "game plan" for bad officiating? and flopping? how's that work, john wooden jr.? I'm saying that at some point, one has to make the bad officiating work for you instead of bitching about it. Sadly, it's now just an expected part of the game. So yes, if the refs are going to reward flopping, why wouldn't you flop in a close game? How is that any different than holding the [expletive] out of people in football if the refs are going to allow it?
-
you act like you're surprised every single game. it's always awful, so the good teams gameplan for it. if the refs are going to let you flop, flop like crazy
-
2013-14 Defending Champion Blackhawks Regular Season Thread
Derwood replied to Drew Doughty's topic in Other Sports
it's a trend or it's a curse (/sulley) -
I missed both championship games and I'm missing the Super Bowl. So what I'm saying is I hope the game is terrible because [expletive] you, I can't watch it
-
It's what old ladies do when they're shocked...shocked, I say! Kinda goes hand-in-hand with "Won't someone think of the children?"
-
They're now saying it won't even be the coldest Super Bowl. Good thing there was a month of hand-wringing and pearl-clutching
-
I hope the Olympics are awesome, because the Blue Jackets now have a full month before their next home game. They also end their pre-Olympic schedule with road games at the top 3 teams in the Pacific
-
one of the best poll results ever
-
That OSU loss was worse than any Illini loss to PSU. This PSU team is terri-bad, and there isn't even the excuse of an unconscious Talor Battle chucking from the midcourt line
-
There are a lot of little tricks to it, things you should have learned a long time ago. Such as, if you leave milk out, it can go sour. Put it in the refrigerator, or, failing that, a cool wet sack.
-
What? I don't see anything but a stock answer there. Pretty standard stuff. I guess you could interpret that statement as Urlacher not believing Cutler is a franchise QB
-
2013-14 Defending Champion Blackhawks Regular Season Thread
Derwood replied to Drew Doughty's topic in Other Sports
Stupid Blue Jackets blew a stupid 2 goal lead in the stupid 3rd period to lost their stupid playoff spot -
I don't think it "muddles" so much as expands on what is very much a work in progress. I mean, do we really care about its credibility with meatballs? All of those variations are just efforts to better refine what WAR can tell us, which is infinitely more valuable/important than whether or not the common whatever embraces it. I mean, wanting it to be "just WAR" seems completely ass-backwards. It muddles it when neither site will reveal their calculations. Yeah, we know one weighs defense or baserunning or whatever more than the other, but when certain players vary wildly in their fWAR/bWAR, it makes it hard for some people to trust. Add in the somewhat nebulous definition of "replacement player", and it's just not something that will ever catch on with the masses. Not that any of that makes in invaluable, of course. People who know how it works will continue to get use out of it
-
Or it feels like a play on the "well, it's called the 'THEORY' of evolution"-argument. Just because some people act like it's set in stone doesn't negate it's value or mean that the people that use it correctly don't understand that it's not perfect. Not at all like that. The problem with war is it's attempt to quantify defense and baserunning. Hitting and pitching stats work because of what they measure, one on one matchups. Football stats don't work because of what it attempts to measure, and the same is true for defense in baseball. But everyone who should know that already knows that; WAR is used as the best metric of overall player value because that's what it is right now. It's not perfect and it's not set in stone, but it's the best available, and the caveats (especially in regards to defense) have been obvious from the get-go; it's very much an evolving thing. The article is just incredibly redundant. to me, the biggest thing hurting WAR's credibility among the common fans and media is that there are several versions of it that are sometimes at odds with each other. If there was just WAR, fine, but with bWAR and fWAR, etc., it muddles what should be a commonly used evaluator
