Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Derwood

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    88,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Derwood

  1. i am looking forward to some creative signs in New England....you have to imagine they are foaming at the mouth to get under Phillip Rivers' skin
  2. Penn State can rebound, but they can't shoot foul shots, so Wiscy just needs to "hack-a-shaq" them and they'll win Unless the Badgers are down towards the end of the game, they just don't foul. They are very sound fundamentally, don't reach, and move their feet. They play great man to man, position defense. is the game on ESPN or BTN? I know it has a weird 9pm local start, which indicates it's probably a TV game
  3. Penn State can rebound, but they can't shoot foul shots, so Wiscy just needs to "hack-a-shaq" them and they'll win
  4. in your opinion. in my opinion, it would be the most wildly popular playoff in sports, even bigger than the men's basketball tourney No, I'm talking about the sport in general. College football as a whole would not be as wildly popular if it had a full on playoff. And there's not a chance in the world that a college football player would be more popular than March Madness. There's just no way that's possible and there are a ton of reasons why. not to mention that it's not always true that the "best team won" at the end of a tournament, even though everyone says this. was NC St better than Houston in 1983? how about villanova-georgetown in 1985? villanova won the ncaa title as an 8 seed, which is the equivalent of the ncaa football championship going to a team that isn't ranked in the top 25. more than an insignificant amount of the time, the team that wins the title in ncaa men's basketball is the team that happened to get hot and lucky at the right time. i like the ncaa tourney for what it is, but i also like that the team winning the ncaa title in football is the team that was the best for 4-5 months, not 3 weeks. so LSU was the best team all year, eh?
  5. Being decent for a long period of time does have value. Whether Vizquel could be considered a decent hitter for that time is up for debate I guess. i have a tough time using 3000 hits (for example) as a standard for induction if it took the player 22 years and 10,000 at bats to get there that's still a .300 batting average. true, but why is 3000/10,000 somehow better than 2,500/8,333?
  6. this might have been a great deal 5 years ago. Andruw Jones to Mark Kotsay is some kind of downgrade. yikes
  7. in your opinion. in my opinion, it would be the most wildly popular playoff in sports, even bigger than the men's basketball tourney
  8. yes, there's also the regular season, which concludes with teams like indy, gb and dallas sitting a lot of their regulars for the last week or two because they're already locked into their playoff spot. 95% of people who don't want a college football playoff (16 teams, say) feel that way not because they think a playoff would be boring, but because it would cheapen what is the most important "regular season" in major sports. and I contend that it the regular season being so "important" is ruining what could be a good thing And I can't figure out why it's more important to have an important regular season than an important postseason. Seems to me like sports are played to win in the postseason primarily, so why cheapen that to make the regular season more important? i made this point before, but i think that the importance on the regular season (this season being the exception) usually kills your team's chances for a title really early. If USC, for example, loses to OSU in the first few weeks next year, they may be eliminated from title contention. It would be like being mathematically eliminated from the playoffs in April of the baseball season Exactly. It's more exciting for fans whose teams are lucky enough (or have a weak enough schedule Ohio State) to make it through the season unbeaten. For those who play in a tough conference a lot of teams are screwed early in the year. A postseason deciding a champion is better than a regular season doing so because, in theory, everybody has similar strengths of schedule in a postseason. OSU getting to play Youngstown State, Akron and whatever other crap they played non-conference was a built-in advantage over a team like Tennessee, for instance, which played Cal plus a tougher SEC schedule. In a postseason though, Ohio State and Tennessee both would have to make it through tough teams. and the current system discourages teams from scheduling tough non-con schedules It's really kind of silly that this system is in place in a major sports atmosphere. You'd think a sport as wildly popular as college football would have at least a mediocre championship season. It's a shame. you can blame: - "tradition" - a spineless NCAA - too much power given to conferences - different conference sizes - different scheduling - small schools being allowed to take money from big schools to come get the snot beat out of them - multi-million payouts by corporate sponsored bowl games
  9. i would like, someday, to be in a position to say "no" when someone offers me $1 billion for something
  10. the difference is that santo actually deserves to be in the hall of fame; rice doesn't. Player A) 15 seasons and mediocre outfielder: 83.2 WARP3 Player B) 14 seasons and excellent infielder: 119.7 WARP3 I'm going with B there. Player A also DH'ed.... a lot
  11. Being decent for a long period of time does have value. Whether Vizquel could be considered a decent hitter for that time is up for debate I guess. i have a tough time using 3000 hits (for example) as a standard for induction if it took the player 22 years and 10,000 at bats to get there
  12. yep, he was the guy we helped train and arm so that Afghanistan could fight off those pesky Russians No, I knew him as the guy who killed hundreds of people in US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and killed several US Sailors on the USS Cole. that too, but my part was true as well
  13. yes, there's also the regular season, which concludes with teams like indy, gb and dallas sitting a lot of their regulars for the last week or two because they're already locked into their playoff spot. 95% of people who don't want a college football playoff (16 teams, say) feel that way not because they think a playoff would be boring, but because it would cheapen what is the most important "regular season" in major sports. and I contend that it the regular season being so "important" is ruining what could be a good thing And I can't figure out why it's more important to have an important regular season than an important postseason. Seems to me like sports are played to win in the postseason primarily, so why cheapen that to make the regular season more important? i made this point before, but i think that the importance on the regular season (this season being the exception) usually kills your team's chances for a title really early. If USC, for example, loses to OSU in the first few weeks next year, they may be eliminated from title contention. It would be like being mathematically eliminated from the playoffs in April of the baseball season Exactly. It's more exciting for fans whose teams are lucky enough (or have a weak enough schedule Ohio State) to make it through the season unbeaten. For those who play in a tough conference a lot of teams are screwed early in the year. A postseason deciding a champion is better than a regular season doing so because, in theory, everybody has similar strengths of schedule in a postseason. OSU getting to play Youngstown State, Akron and whatever other crap they played non-conference was a built-in advantage over a team like Tennessee, for instance, which played Cal plus a tougher SEC schedule. In a postseason though, Ohio State and Tennessee both would have to make it through tough teams. and the current system discourages teams from scheduling tough non-con schedules
  14. yes, there's also the regular season, which concludes with teams like indy, gb and dallas sitting a lot of their regulars for the last week or two because they're already locked into their playoff spot. 95% of people who don't want a college football playoff (16 teams, say) feel that way not because they think a playoff would be boring, but because it would cheapen what is the most important "regular season" in major sports. and I contend that it the regular season being so "important" is ruining what could be a good thing And I can't figure out why it's more important to have an important regular season than an important postseason. Seems to me like sports are played to win in the postseason primarily, so why cheapen that to make the regular season more important? i made this point before, but i think that the importance on the regular season (this season being the exception) usually kills your team's chances for a title really early. If USC, for example, loses to OSU in the first few weeks next year, they may be eliminated from title contention. It would be like being mathematically eliminated from the playoffs in April of the baseball season
  15. vizquel's offensive numbers are as much a result of longevity as being particularly good
  16. Sosa skips out on it again. what a selfish prick
  17. it's unhealthy for the veteran's committee to be stocked with players who don't want anyone else at their position voted in (Morgan, Schmidt, etc.)
  18. i'm not sure how anyone can objectively look at Blyleven's stats and NOT vote for him
  19. fixed /pet peeve
  20. yes, there's also the regular season, which concludes with teams like indy, gb and dallas sitting a lot of their regulars for the last week or two because they're already locked into their playoff spot. 95% of people who don't want a college football playoff (16 teams, say) feel that way not because they think a playoff would be boring, but because it would cheapen what is the most important "regular season" in major sports. and I contend that it the regular season being so "important" is ruining what could be a good thing
  21. Have fun with 2 years of special teams coverage Justin. if only you were as good as you think you are
  22. these playoffs demonstrate why I would love a college football playoff. Is San Diego a better team than Indy? are the Giants better than Dallas? maybe not in the long term, but for one day they were, which created excitement, upsets, etc. now add in the passion of college football fans and you have an amazing thing
  23. i just came to ask vance for pics from the game....glad you all beat me to the snark
  24. yep, he was the guy we helped train and arm so that Afghanistan could fight off those pesky Russians
  25. Sean Lee is staying at PSU \:D/
×
×
  • Create New...