Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Derwood

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    88,586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Derwood

  1. I can see the Cubs moving Fukudome to RF and doing something absolutely asinine like getting Chone Figgins for CF. That's a lot smarter of a move than making Milton Bradley the focus of your offseason plans. Figgins is basically the same age as Bradley and is way, way worse at baseball
  2. You may be right, but again, who plays RF for the Cubs next year?
  3. Agree 100%. He's basically an overpaid, injury-prone, [expletive] version of Scott Hatteberg. WANT Find me one person on this board who thinks Bradley is as good as Bonds. One.
  4. you think those would be his numbers next year? they could be worse for all you or I know. More likely he'd suffer some season ending injury in the first week. they could be. But it's pretty clear that this season's numbers are an anomaly (only 2nd time in last 6 years to OPS under .800).
  5. Good thing Bradley produced THIS YEAR for us. Oh my God, I really think you do this just to get a rise out of people yet you continue to ignore the facts about Bradley's productivity this year. what the hell are you talking about? You folks keep bringing up his "productivity" as if it is something to write home about. 9.1 VORP, 3.2 WARP3, .775 OPS That's hardly irreplaceable. I don't know who is out there we can get or who we can promote, but those are hardly great numbers. you think those would be his numbers next year?
  6. The Cubs have 2 or 3 open spots on the 40-man, so it wouldn't require a second move
  7. You don't know that. Yeah he does. Who's replacing Bradley in RF next year? I'm eager to hear your response. Why don't you wait until we see who actually will replace him next year before you make any proclamations as to who will have a better season. Speculation at this point is like pissing in the wind. Or you can look at the realistic in-house and free agent RF options for next year and see that I'm right
  8. RF is quickly turning into pre-Ramirez 3B for the Cubs. Between Santo and Aram, the Cubs went through a billion mediocre third basemen. Now we're suffering from a run of crap in RF post-Sosa.
  9. Good thing Bradley produced THIS YEAR for us. this year is over. I'm concerned about next year. I don't particularly want Micah Hoffpauir or Mark DeRosa in RF next year
  10. and so what if he does? He didn't want to be here and it's apparent that both the management and the players didn't like him either. The team (on the field) will be worse for losing him. There's no way to quantify the off-the-field stuff in terms of wins and losses
  11. Bradley will outplay whoever the Cubs stick in RF next year.
  12. this stadium is an affront to humanity
  13. lololol yeah, you're right, he's totally going to hit .250 every year from now on So, a guy who is a career .277 hitter is going to hit .330? Ok. hyperbole, have you heard of it? Even if he hits .290 next year it will be a damning reflection on Hendry
  14. lololol yeah, you're right, he's totally going to hit .250 every year from now on
  15. I can't wait for the Cubs to trade him for pennies on the dollar and then for Bradley to hit .330 for another team next year
  16. which "bounces and breaks" were those? the two missed FG's, Olsen getting Forte's fumble, etc.
  17. well this makes up for last week......the bounces (and breaks) went the Bears way in a game they probably should have lost.
  18. the smug in here is growing thick in here
  19. he just didn't want to be good last week. that's it.
  20. I hope Paul Sullivan and all you idiots are happy now. The team is now worse and we'll have to watch Bobby Scales in the OF the rest of the season.
  21. oh for [expletive]'s sake
  22. Why not? It was scheduled that way in the preseason when Iowa was ranked and PSU was top 10. They're both 3-0 now. Plus they can re-live the game they had last year like they did with Texas Tech/Texas. It's probably the 2nd best game of the weekend. makes me nervous. Don't need to see PSU get upset at home in primetime
  23. Have fun watching this, guys. I'm stuck with Denver/Cleveland....
  24. no idea why PSU/Iowa is in primetime.
  25. one point
×
×
  • Create New...