How is it dumb? It's obvious some pitchers are great unless in the save situation and then they can't handle it (LaTroy anyone). If you think the save is dumb then you have to think the win is dumb for starters (or loss). Why does it matter if they win or lose. All that matters is how many innings they pitch and what ERA they have. Same can be said about home runs. Who cares if he hits it over the wall all that matters is how many runs and rbis he gets throughout the season. Yep! This is correct. But I have to take issue with what Golden Thunder said. Most of us here know how flawed/superfluous the save stat is, but those who are paid to talk baseball, for the most part, do not. So, it is a little surprising that no one is talking about this because, no matter how silly it may be, sports writers and ESPN anchors normally eat the stuff up. Maybe this is a little more evidence of a growing east coast bias, where even things that would normally be a big deal aren't being reported because they are on the wrong side of the country. It's worth looking at, and certainly open to debate past the whole "the save is stupid" comments. OK, I shouldn't have said that people are realizing it