come on. they trailed by more than a touchdown going into the fourth quarter. part of the margin of victory was an interception returned 90 yards for a touchdown after the ball bounced off of 30 players, and indiana also got jobbed out of 7 points by a terrible review ruling. in addition to that they needed indiana to completely choke and then give up to win by that margin. so fumble/INT returns shouldn't count in the final score? b/c that's going to turn a few of Iowa's nailbiters into bigger wins (Arkansas State had a 75 yard pick 6, UM had a pick 6, probably others). Iowa's defense causes TOs. Why is that a bad thing for Iowa? The overturned TD may or may not have been a TD. I didn't see a replay that showed convincingly that he was in. I can certainly see why the replay guys thought his leg landed out at the same time the foot landed in. It was a close play. Playing the what if game with the most recent victory while not looking in detail at all the other games is sort of a load of crap though. Stanzi had a crappy 3rd Qtr and a very good 4th Qtr. Indiana's not a great team. They have some talent, but they have a lot of flaws. Shouldn't be surprising that as the game goes on, the better team is going to pull away. With the obvious exception of points scored in "garbage time" when both teams have scrubs in, it's surprising to me that 4th Qtr points are somehow less valuable in your opinion than points scored earlier in the game. They won by 18. It wasn't a nail-biter. I don't think it's fair to say that was an 18 point game. It was closer than that and if it weren't for the weird pick 6 then it might be a blowout the other way. But Iowa outscored Indiana 35-3 in the second half. What would people's perceptions be if Iowa was up 35-3 at the end of the first half and then won by the same score?