No. Z is the best player in that deal by far. ??? Z is great and all. I'm definitely one of his biggest fans, but how can you make that statement? ARod is one of the top 3 or so players in the game. If Zambrano is better than Arod...it certainly isn't "by far". Top 3? Come on! He's good, but let's put this in perspective. He's the Yankees #8 hitter..........................and the fans don't like him. He's not valued like he once was. This isn't the ARod that's FA eligible for the first time in Seattle. He's still a great player, but I would be very suprised if the Yanks get anything back in return that equals what they gave up to get him. Um...wow. I dont care that the fans don't like him. I don't care that Torre was dumb and decided to bat Arod 8th. ARod is a top player. Maybe top 3 is a little bit of a stretch, but not much. I can't think of too many more players I'd rather have than him. A .900 OPS is a down year for him. If he can still play SS (which I believe he can) he's easily a top 5 player. Anyways, my point was saying that someone who plays once every five days (although very good, young, and relatively cheap for now) is "by far" better than one of the greatest players of our time, is a bit much. I'm not saying I would do that deal (Arod/Hughes for Zambrano/Dempster) but I would have to think twice about it. To dismiss ARod's situation in NY is crazy to me. Torre didn't put ARod in the 8 hole because he was tearing the cover off the ball! He did it because he'd been struggling and wasn't driving in runs. Perception is a beautiful thing. NY fans know ARod is talented, but he "seems" to never produce in the clutch. I have many friends that are Yanks fans that say ARod isn't a top 5 player on the Yanks team. While I don't think that's correct, I'm not going to ignore the perception when making trade offers. I remember seeing a stat about how Arod had the most game winning hits or something like that this year. This whole clutch issue is way overblown. I don't believe in "clutch". But since you brought it up, he hit for a .939 OPS with RISP, a .970 OPS with RISP and 2 outs, and a 1.289 OPS when the bases were loaded. Those are typical "clutch" situations, aren't they? His career numbers are very good in those situations as well. So what if he had a few bad playoff games (a total of 29 ABs in the playoffs the past 2 years)? How bout in 2004 when he hit .320 with a 1.014 OPS in 11 playoff games (50 ABs)? Are you going to disregard his play in the playoffs that year, because it doesn't fit into your argument?