Because that's something you can just do with no repercussions. Is it? Because who the hell knows, assuming the player is down with it. As I recall, a few years back when Zack Greinke came out with his social anxiety disorder, and suddenly underpermforming players such as Dontrelle Willis and Milton Bradley were coming out of the woodwork saying "oh yeah, I have that too," there was debate (I believe S.I.) over whether or not a seperate DL for "mental breaks" should be a thing. Maybe it should be. Cripes. No, I was being sarcastic. Starlin isn't going to agree to a phony injury to be shut down for 2 months in a playoff race so that someone younger and cheaper can take his job, thus ending his season with the worst numbers of his career. Plus social anxiety disorder is an actual diagnosis, and then SCS starts going on about a DL about nebulous "mental break" stints. If a player goes on the DL for something like SAD it's for actual medical reasons, not because he just needs some time to clear his head or have a timeout because they're playing poorly. And I know that it's an actual diagnosis. What I'm saying is that after he was diagnosed with it, there was a sudden slew of players who claimed to have it (don't have a link, but there was an SI article about Greinke's struggle when he was diagnosed, also featuring Willis, Bradley, Ian Snell, among others.) And with or without a diagnosis, I can understand how tremendously stressful a line of work professional sports can be. All poor multi-millionaire jokes aside, when compared to other high paid celebrities who don't have a packed arena full of drunks and meatheads mercilously booing and heckling when they [expletive] up, so who knows what kind of emotional toll it can take. And keep in mind, this is a 25 head old far, far away from home. My point is that I don't think it's unreasonable to have an inactivity list (say 5-7 days) for guys who simply need a mental break. And yes, I know.