Maholm is this year's Jeff Blauser. His career record is good at Wrigley Field is good because he faced the Cubs all those years not because he is good. By that logic, pretty much every hitter who faced the Cubs in Blausers era should have great numbers at Wrigley, and every pitcher who faced them in Maholms years with the Pirates should as well, and true or not, I'm too lazy to check the splits a good chunk of Maholms Pirates career was '07-'09 when the Cubs were good, or in the case of '08, great. My point was that just because some mediocre player has decent numbers against you, it doesn't mean that you ought to acquire that player. I guess that is a little too deep for some posters. That's not why the signed him. It was because of his upside. He was off to a great start last year, and it appeared he was in his way to meeting his potential before he got injured. I believe he got a 1/5 deal, which doesn't sound super low risk, but with the amount of available money they had at the time it was a risk worth taking for 1 year. Shark, Maholm, and Volstad were all highly touted not too long ago, and can still potentially make up one hell of a back end of the rotation. I mean who's he really blocking? Rodrigo Lopez? All of the Iowa starters have been mediocre to awful.