Not necessarily. He's fine to have out there as a cheap player with mediocre to decent production if you're adding an Adrian Gonzalez at first base & such. He's the kind of player where you take advantage of any cheap production he can provide, then if he doesn't grow as a player, you trade him or non-tender him when his price starts to grow. Kinda like Theriot. This is my thinking. If he can provide cheap, adequate production that allows us to spend more elsewhere, then I'm happy with him. I'm happy for cheap adequate production, but I wouldn't be too happy if they penciled him into a corner position. Theriot was adequate for a short period because he played SS. But they also endured a season of crap in his first year, and are paying him millions to suck this year. The danger is holding on too long to somebody who gives you a brief period of cost effective production. Unless Colvin takes a huge step forward, he's not somebody you want as your opening day starting RF, barring an unexpected upgrade in performance at some other position. If you had a Chase Utley at 2B, maybe you can deal with that. But if you're a top payroll club expecting to be among the best teams, willingly opening a season with somebody who is likely to be an out machine starting at a position that needs to produce.