Backtobanks
-
Posts
7,353 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Backtobanks
-
$23 million next year and then $5 million buyout.
-
The newspaper used to be pretty conservative, but it has moved slightly to the left. It used to be that their political endorsements would be basically very Republican unless a Democrat was running unopposed. :lol:
-
Kinda glad we avoided him. His contract wasn’t bad or anything but would hope we are aiming higher. Robertson, Allen, Ottavino, Britton (if medicals check out and they feel good), etc. Do we have the money to aim higher?
-
This offseason has been Trumpian in that every bad story has been topped by another bad story within days of the last one.
-
So that's how they fit him into the budget. Now if we can convince Harper to do a deal like that.
-
This offseason is kind of like sitting at the kid's table for Christmas dinner.
-
We waiting until the decent players are gone to go dumpster diving.
-
Schwarber officially on trade block
Backtobanks replied to jersey cubs fan's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I’m in for this. Or something like Schwarber and Q for an Indians pitcher or those two for Jon Gray How about Scwarber and Quintana for Camargo and Teheran. Gives the Braves the slugger they want, gives us another versatile player. Opens up possibility of trading Zobrist, Russell, and/or Happ and makes room for signing Harper. -
The Cubs didn't realize that $40million was per year not over 7 years.
-
Which would be the bigger shock: Bryce signing with the Cubs or Baines making the HOF?
-
I love all of this CYA reporting - "The Cubs don't have the money for Harper, but you never know." LOL
-
Apparently you didn't hear that Schwarber isn't on the trade block, so we'll have to lure a team to take on Heywards contract by using Chatwood, Russell, Duensing, Kintzler, Bote, or Caratini. :lol: It's funny how you disappeared when the cubs were on top of the world and now you're back with a vengeance at the slightest hint of trouble. I never disappeared as you keep claiming, but what is this trouble that you talk about? I see posters claiming we're a 95 win team without making any moves. We just need Harper to put the cherry on top of the cupcake.
-
Apparently you didn't hear that Schwarber isn't on the trade block, so we'll have to lure a team to take on Heywards contract by using Chatwood, Russell, Duensing, Kintzler, Bote, or Caratini. :lol:
-
I have a hunch the overwhelming majority of Cub fans would love to trade Quintana for Jimenez & Cease. As a trade chip I'd take him back, sure. As a big league player, he is a DH or a bad corner outfielder. Sounds like my description of Schwarber two years ago.
-
I have a hunch the overwhelming majority of Cub fans would love to trade Quintana for Jimenez & Cease.
-
That's true, but hearing and seeing Bryce Harper and Eloy Jimenez all over the daily media would be frustrating, especially if the Cubs struggle.
-
Kevin Negandhi ✔ @KNegandhiESPN Top 3 teams in the Bryce Harper Sweepstakes according to @kurkjian_ESPN 1. Phillies 2. Dodgers 3. White Sox 3,350 5:54 PM - Dec 7, 2018 It would be bad enough losing out on Harper, but it would really be bad knowing we lost out on him to the White Sox.
-
Professional hitter? I didn't think he was going to sign an amateur.
-
He already has cut down on his HR swing.
-
Jordan Bastian ✔ @MLBastian Theo Epstein: "No one hitter, especially in the seas where we're fishing, is going to transform the offense. It's going to be a continued evolution of what I think is a group of really, really talented position players that stumbled badly in the second half of last year."
-
if you wanna do wishful thinking, just pretend that we have the budget for harper and he wants to be here, but we're trying to move other pieces so we can sign both he and machado. harper wants to be here strongly enough that he's delaying his signing and the terms of his contract until we're further along with machado. As long as we're doing wishful thinking, don't forget the trade of Chatwood, Duensing, Russell, Kintzler and Heyward for Trout so that we can clear some contracts.
-
Theo quote from today's Tribune: "And there will be winters when we do acquire a big name, and there will be winters that we don't acquire a big name. I don't know what category this winter will fall into yet, but there's a chance there's going to be a winter where we don't acquire a big name from outside the organization. That does not represent failure." That sounds to me like he's preparing us for some unpleasant news.
-
He would really have to want to play for the Cubs to take that deal. If other teams are offering him $35 million plus for every year, would he accept $20 million per year for the first two years waiting for a huge payday after that. Also, if he wants to play for a winner, there wouldn't be much of a guarantee that the Cubs would be competitive with big pay raises/extensions to Baez, Contreras, Bryant, Hendricks, etc. in addition to his huge bump of $30 million.
-
Has he thrown any ML innings since his surgery? Actually I'm worried about what we can expect out of Darvish and whether Bryant's shoulder is okay with rest or will he have more pain.
-
What was Rosenthal saying again? He tweeted something like “Theo watch is on” in response to Mooney’s article the other day asking are the Cubs “laying in the weeds” on Harper and then he was on MLBN last night saying he expects the Cubs to make moves and it could be big. That clip is like a page or two back I think. That's really going out on a limb "saying he expects the Cubs to make moves and it could be big". Does any really think the Cubs aren't going to make any moves this offseason? "It could be big" or maybe not. :lol: