I say that Dunn would not be an upgrade over Murton because of the following reasons: 1) Dunn is scheduled to make 7-8 million more than Murton this year 2) He will be a free agent after this year while Murton still has a few years under club control 3) Murton is about 2 years younger, and has a better ability to improve upon his major league numbers than Dunn does at the moment. Is Dunn the better player at the moment? Certainly-if you take salaries and everything else out of the equation, I'd take Dunn for 2007 only every single time. Murton I believe is the better value though. You're the Cubs, money doesn't matter. Dunn's not a free agent after this year, he's a free agent after next year. Murton's never going to put up 40/100. Murton's not even going to play everyday for the Cubs. I think the Cubs would rather have Dunn too.