Well, that's false. So we have a person who has previously commented on how he views the game and how he wants to manage, what he believes in, etc. Then, that person follows through on said thoughts and by all accounts, indeed manages that exact way in the minors. Now, one would logically assume that he wouldn't completely change his beliefs, even in the majors, given the fact that said beliefs don't even have much to do with player development in the first place, and in his view, deal with winning (which would be his major league goal as opposed to development). One could make an argument that he wants a job at any cost, and would agree to change his minor league style to simply get a job, despite it conflicting with how he said he views the game of baseball in the first place. But instead of realizing that's unlikely, though possible, you seem to state it's extremely likely with the "false" comment. See where there's a perceived problem? So if I drove a Nissan Maxima and then drive a Lamborghini, I am going to drive the Lambo the same because I drove the Maxima first? The players will be different, the situations will be different and most of all, it's not the minor leagues, where teaching the game is more prevelant than at the major league level. And most of his "views" on the game are him wanting players to play hard and the right way, which I am not sure where the problem is in those comments. So there's a decent chance that everything he's done to this point would change in the majors? Sure, I guess. I'd rather just get someone that has done things right to this point and assume they will continue doing that.