With the talk this week of extensions for Hendry and Baker, I have to think we are in for an extended period of mediocrity. This team is probably good enough to win 85-90 games in 2006 if they can keep people healthy. Honestly, if Wood, Prior, and Zambrano are healthy, the pitching is pretty good at the top. Maddux and Williams aren't a great back end but they aren't the worst in baseball either. The offense is probably going to be about the same as last year. Pierre and Cedeno should be better than CF and SS last year. Lee will drop but hopefully ARam will be around for the whole year. I could see 700-720 runs again in 2006. Thus, if the pitching can improve to 650 runs or so, a tall order but not at all impossible, with a little luck this team will be in contention. Granted those are a lot of ifs, but I think the 2006 Cubs will be good enough to warrant extensions. What amazes me about Hendry is that he almost seems to strive for medicority. Constantly pursuing the second tier, the almost great, the pretty good (in addiiton to the pretty bad). The Cubs seem doomed to never step into the dominant team role because they aren't willing to commit to dominant players.