Uh, Jon, I only set it in the future for the fun of it. It is the exact same scenario the Cubs faced on July 31st last season so it is completely relevent. It couldn't be a more relevent hypothetical. The argument is about the future, not the scenario. Well, oddly enough, it is almost the exact same situation (just change a few minor details) the Cubs faced with Wood last season, who was the Cubs best right-handed set-up man at the time just like Howry is now. So for all intents and purposes, it is completely plausible. According to the doctors, Kerry wouldn't be further damaged if allowed to pitch with the rotator fraying. He just would have to deal with the discomfort which would get a lot easier if he is only pitching an inning instead of 6 or 7 innings. So, basically, the Cubs were presented with the exact same choice on July 31st last season that you have called not plausible. You are 4 games back of the wildcard with two months to play. Anything can happen. You are given the choice of sitting your best set up man (last season Wood, this season Howry) or not sitting him and putting your best 25 on the field to try to get into the playoffs. What would you choose? The doctor's word aside, it didn't take into account him messing something else up. When you pitch with discomfort, you change your mechanics. It's dangerous. And how is the scenario plausible? When is the best reliever on a team shut down when there's no injury? There are many considerations that an injury brings. It is absolutely relevant to the decision. Where do you get 12 IPs? Is that the amount of innings your best set up will pitch in two months? Because that is the potential difference Kerry would have made, not 12 innings. I don't know where you got that. Even though they didn't follow through with it, what happened to not pitching Kerry in multiple innings or pitching him on back-to-back days? I'm not sure the doctor considered that. And that's the only way he even got to 12 IP in the month he pitched. Even though they did that, Kerry Wood was not being treated as a normal reliever. He was being treated as an injured pitcher who was going to be used out the bullpen as long as it made sense and only in situations in which he was needed. That was going to limit his innings. The problem was their judgement in keeping him in the bullpen. I thought baseball and the GM's job was about winning games. So the GM's job stops after the last two months? Or are the next season's game less important, even when you're in a better position to compete. They focus on more than one season at a time. No GM makes moves based on one season. No, Jon. That's why I mentioned that they were only 4 games out with two months to play. Come on, let's have an honest discussion, okay? If they were more games back with less time to play, of course it would make a difference. It obviously did make a difference to Cubs management because they chose to shut him down on August 31st. I probably would have done it a week or so earlier, but now we are talking about a 1-2 weeks difference instead of a month. The potential impact of Kerry Wood not being with the team the next season for a period of one to two weeks is rather negligible, don't you think? You mentioned 4 games out because that's where they were. I didn't see you say anything about where they were a week, two weeks, or three weeks later. And I don't see how three starts is negligible. Here, we agree. So if you want to blame Hendry and Baker for having Kerry miss a week or two more this season than was absolutely necessary, I will gladly join you. I didn't mean those of you who have been bashing the move from the beginning, I meant Cubs fans in general. If other things hadn't gone wrong (Rusch and Williams collapsing, Lee injury, Ramirez and Pierre underperforming), the Cubs would be in a much better place right now and Marshall would ostensibly be replacing Wood. Many people would look at this move as a decent gamble to take to give the Cubs their best chance of winning last season and that it has had very little to no impact on the results of the Cubs this season given Marshall's excellent performance. Unfortunately, a lot of other unrelated and unexpected things have gone wrong and so here we are. Marshall would not be pitching for Wood right now. He replaced Williams in the rotation as the #4 started. If Prior was healthy, which they assumed would be the case going into the season, the rotation would have started off as Prior, Maddux, Z, Rusch, and Williams. If Williams pitched himself out of the rotation during ST, which he did, they would have gone with a 4-man rotation and then have Williams join the rotation later. I don't see the Cubs leaving Williams in AAA to start the season and leaving him out of the rotation. That is not Hendry's style. If they did bring up Marshall, it would have been several weeks into the season to replace Williams. And at that point, Hill probably would have been the more attractive option. But the way it worked out with Marshall was just luck on Hendry's part, which isn't a good method for GMs. Nobody expected him to be ready to compete for that position. That can't be used to justify the decision and shouldn't even really be brought up. The potential downside is what...two fewer wins to date this season, maybe? The potential upside was giving the Cubs and their fans their best chance of getting into the playoffs and winning a World Series. Unless you are seeing a different downside, I don't see how you are justifying the above statement. The potential downside is a month or more without one of your best starting pitchers when you're starting tied for first. The potential upside was a making a minimal contribution out of the bullpen to a team on its way down and in competition with 7 other teams for the Wild Card spot. And a week later, they were 8th in that Wild Card race. I doubt I'm the only one who saw a much better chance to get to the World Series this year than on August 1st last year, when the Cubs were doing nothing to stand out from the pack.