He didn't say they can't rely on homeruns, but he did say that tracking down a handful of extra balls hit to the outfield and getting them back in quickly is more of a necessity in Wrigley than hitting HRs. It's a Dusty-esque statement and, as if it needs to be said, also an absurd one. Wrigley Field ranked 5th in the majors in park factor for HRs, 6th in doubles, and 7th in triples. In 2005, Wrigley was 11th in HRs, 12th in doubles, and 12th in triples. In 2004, 2nd in HRs, 14th in doubles, and 15th in triples. And between 2001 and 2003, they were just below average in HRs. There is nothing to suggest that getting on base and hitting for power isn't a good strategy for Wrigley Field. It's just that they don't actually bother to try it out. And yes, in 2004, the Cubs were only 7th in the NL in runs scored not because of being 1st in HRs and 2nd in SLG, but because they were 11th in OBP. OBP and SLG is always a great way to score runs regardless of the home ballpark. Finding outfielders with speed to get to the ball quicker isn't going to do that much in the grand scheme of things.