In fairness to the Braves, they pretty much did the city a favor by utilizing the Olympic Stadium, putting their own money into it to make it a bit more baseball friendly, and staying there for 20 years of OK attendance despite a very good team. That Olympic Stadium would have been built whether or not the Braves took it over afterwards. This, in my opinion, is far less egregious than the new stadium the Falcons are building right next to their existing stadium that is currently good enough to hold Super Bowls, the SEC title game, and other various college football games and has no additional redeeming quality such as moving to be closer to the fans, etc... You could argue that it will help them keep the SEC game and get a future Super Bowl, but those assumptions are a bit dubious. Overall, both scenarios seem unnecessary, but the football one would chap my ass a bit more if I lived there. i refuse to believe it's almost been 20 years since those olympics. it's simply not true