imb
-
Posts
31,200 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
112
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by imb
-
It was closer to a fumble than to what you're describing
-
listen to how stupid that argument sounds. It's not enough to get your feet in, it's not enough to get your feet in and possess the ball, it's not enough to get your feet in and possess the balland control it, it's not enough to get your feet in and possess the ball and control it and to make a football move. I mean at that point, the ball is yours.
-
Well, if the catch yesterday happened as Bryant was heading out of bounds, he wouldn't have reached the ball forward for the end zone. My scenario could be in the middle of the field. So, if the player gets greedy with his ball control it's catch? I'm confused what your point is. Just looking for clarification. "Greedy with his ball control" implies that he had control of the ball already, which would have made him down by contact. I hate that im arguing this so much because it's really in that nebulous realm that I can see it going either way, and Dallas was not going to stop Rodgers from going back down the field so ultimately it probably doesn't matter. I just think if a receiver snatches the ball, gets three feet in and the ball falls out as he reaches for the end zone, it's a catch. I can see if he's bobbling the thing, but it seemed like he had total control, enough to forcibly reach his hands out.
-
Well, if the catch yesterday happened as Bryant was heading out of bounds, he wouldn't have reached the ball forward for the end zone.
-
I don't think that's right
-
But how can you maintain possession w/o the ever critical football move? Without it, you technically don't even have possession
-
But the ball dislodged because he had possession and reached for the goal line
-
The "football move" thing is weird anyway. You snatch one in the back of the end zone, and tap two bug toes down and it's a TD. You don't need a football move?
-
Lol refs made that call on cribbs just to [expletive] with me
-
Yeah the ball definitely hit the ground, but if you've got possession, THREE feet in and it touches when you reach for the end zone, that should probably not count imo.
-
How many steps before it matters? 9? 15? What a stupid rule. Oh well GB was better and would have gone down and scored again anyway
-
I don't know, I think the baseball hall of fame seems cool
-
#cookinforbae
-
[expletive], i thought he was just 30 -
Yep. It reminds me a bit of Byron Leftwich. Nice comp. He still scares me with the Bucs though, but no way he goes #1 to them. Marriota won't be good for a few years if at all and the Saints will be in full rebuild mode by then. Dak Prescott is more of a Tebow, IMO. I just mean the throwing motion, it's so loopy. It looks like that classic lefthanded windup.
-
i did and im not sure why tinyface Ahahahahha I get it now, they're distant cousins or something, for sure
-
i was saying that last year, he looks like tebow
-
i did and im not sure why
-
HE HIT A BIG HOME RUN ONCE
-
why would you want to move to ny if you live in memphis
-
i think what im saying is i dont want to do this again if i dont have to, lol. it was a pain in the ass keeping up with this league and the other league last year and I really felt like i neglected this team. Ill stick around obviously if you cant find someone else, but just CONSIDER IT.
-
i bet smoltz gets in
-
what if i just stepped out? that would even things out and you could have a reverse expansion draft or something
-
Now with less suh
-
eddie guardado lmao
