Yeah, this is the perfect opportunity to trade Soler for some pitching or whatever and pick up a 3-win certainty OF in his place. It's completely reasonable (based on his playoff performance) that he is that or more by this year even, but it's probably not worth the risk.
The issue isn't whether you are "happy" to let him opt-out after the three years. The issue is whether that scenario is *good enough* to balance out the downside of being stuck with him if he isn't. Would you give 33-year-old David Price (coming off three straight healthy, productive years) 4/120?
my god, i wanted to see where kobe ranked in PER (257th, 9.94.) But there's a lot of sadness in these rankings Paul Pierce (307th, 6.72) Vince Carter (301st, 7.14) Derrick Rose (253rd, 10.27) Joakim Noah (242nd, 10.70)
so what? if you dont give him an opt out and just give him straight 7/210, and he's good but not great, he can't opt out anyway, so what's the difference
To me, the overpay comes in the form of the opt-out after three years. He's the highest paid pitcher in history, it's probably tough to get much more money after that. I would not hesitate to give these guys opt outs. If I can get three years of a stud pitcher but he walks away for more money after, fine by me. Give me the three year of studliness for only money and I am all set. yeah for real, that's best case scenario.
wander cabrera was a five star prospect in my OOTP franchise from the time he was 18 until he was 27, but he never got any better than 1 star. that's my wander cabrera story
So this happened today. Some redneck was trolling curt schilling on facebook about the video game thing and Curt got into this long drawn out fight where they both looked like idiots. Then he threatened (sort of) to shoot the guy, which was really funny. So i pointed it out on twitter and he actually responded lol https://twitter.com/DGoforth918/status/669312011050684416
Pardon? you [expletive] dumbass, it's easy to understand what this means unless you're intentionally trying to take it the wrong way which of course you are so long story short [expletive] off Well that was a bit much. Holidays getting to you? fuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuu ccccccccccc kkkkkkkkkkkk offffffffffffffff
Pardon? you [expletive] dumbass, it's easy to understand what this means unless you're intentionally trying to take it the wrong way which of course you are so long story short [expletive] off
It seems like a viable option. Starlin had a really good month or whatever to end the year, but he is pretty objectively meh at best. Gardner would seem like selling high on Starlin. If we go after Heyward and cheap(ish) pitching, Gardner wouldn't be needed. If we go after Price or Greinke or whatever, then Gardner would be cool with me.