People look at the 40 HRs and the power-hitter body and automatically assume Dunn's a middle-of-the-order run producer. He's not. He doesn't put the ball in play nearly enough to drive in the guys on base ahead of him with any sort of consistency. I recently came across a stat called OBI (and OBI%). OBI (Others Batted In) = runs batted in, except for the batter driving himself in via a home run. Equal to RBI-HR. OBI% = the fraction of runners on base who were driven in during a batter's plate appearances. Baseball's elite run producers show OBI%s of around 20%. Numbers in the high teens are good; mid-teens are decent; low teens are below average. Dunn was at 12.7% in 2006 (good for #208 of 256 guys w/ 300+ PAs), and 13.5% in 2005 (187th of 275). Needless to say, that's not the sort of production you want out of your #3/4/5 hitters. That's an interesting statistic that makes lots of sense. I don't know what the hard thing to understand is about a #2 hitter who can handle the bat. I'd rather have a guy like Jay Bell hitting second - a guy who doesn't necessarily have a great Batting Average, but can move the runners over with a groundout, bunt, or flyball to set up the RBI machines. I like situational hitters in the #2 spot, and I like them with speed.