He's got a knack for assembling teams that would look good if, and only if, everything went well and there were no setbacks. He builds teams that could win, instead of teams that should win. So you don't think the 2004 were built to win? Prior, Wood, Zambrano, Maddux, Clement was supposed to be the best rotation in baseball. It was not Hendry's fault that year for relying on Prior and Wood. It was his fault in 2005 and 2006 for relying on them but not 2004 when they had all been healthy in 2003. They did win, 89 games. 1 more than the season before. It was a nominal improvement. When I speak of building teams that should win, I'm talking about building teams that should win 95-100 games. Teams that should be near locks for the playoffs, or extremely close to a lock. Not a team that might skate by if things fall the right way (like the 2003 did).