Wait, wait, wait...all you said is that "he'll never be a successful manager." That implies that as a manager of a baseball team, he will not succeed. Your team winning the WS flies completely in the face of that. Now, question his statements and his attitude and his temper, etc., that's totally different. No, his success doesn't give him a license to do and say whatever he wants. But you cannot argue that he has not had tremendous success as a manager. And what does Dusty have to do with any of this? None of that has anything to do with whether Ozzie is a successful manager, which he has been and which he still is. Let's see if I can untangle this...you hypothetically ask whether or not I'd be as mad at Dusty as I am now had the Cubs won in 2003, ignoring the fact that a WINNING Cubs team in 2003 drastically changes the face of any Cubs team afterwards. But if we want to do this in ridiculous over-simplified terms, yes, I would be ticked off at how bad the team was last year and this even if they had won in '03. Hell, probably even more so since they won the friggin' WS in 2003 and then less than 2 years later turn into one of the worst teams in baseball. Now what the hell does any of that have to do with Ozzie his success as a manager? The White Sox don't stink...in fact, a lot of people think they're even better than last year. Where exactly is he not succeeding AS A MANAGER?