However you want to phrase it. Anyone still want to debate whether the picthers wanted Barrett to be traded? their performance says it doesn't matter. and if they wanted him gone just because they didn't like him then that's just as much their problem as barrett's. Look, I'm not saying it's the case, but is it really impossible that Barrett simply wasn't a good "fit," whatever that means, with this team at this point? Maybe his performance with the Padres is an example of the old hoary "change of scenery" cliche. Again, I'm not saying that this is at all definite, but you seem to respond to every idea that Barrett's time with this team had simply run its course as if they can't possibly be correct.