Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    98,114

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    207

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Sammy Sofa
    I think you're confused about what a "copout" is. So are you saying I have a responsibility to stand by the Cubs, no matter how poorly run they are, no matter how unpleasant they are to watch? No matter how many predictably stupid moves they make, even though I'm powerless to change these things? Okay, then, I happily admit I'm "copping out" of my sacred responsibility as a Cubs fan, whenever it suits me. My point was that people are responsible for their own choices, and if you reach a point where your decision to be a Cubs fan is making your life miserable, it's a copout to say you can't change it. Whether or not to follow the team is ultimately the only power you DO have in this situation, and you'd be a fool to rule it out over some archaic romantic idea that it's in your blood or some crap like that. I never said it was some kind of "sacred responsibility:" I just don't see the point in giving up on a team one has rooted for all or most of their life because they're often bad. If that's the idea, why root for any team ever for any prolonged period of time unless they're winning? There's also a huge difference between choosing to not watch or follow a team and actually becoming a fan of a different team altogether. Of course anyone here COULD change being fans of the Cubs: any statements along those lines should be obvious hyperbole.
  2. Sammy Sofa
    http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/floor1/entrance-hall/portrait-jfk.jpg
  3. Sammy Sofa
    And he brought this all on himself. There may be some blame to go around, but 99% of it is on Milton Bradley and people need to stop pretending otherwise. Nobody's really doing that (if anything it's people talking about how to ideally attempt to maximize a bad situation), nor was that the question.
  4. Sammy Sofa
    Not lamenting it anymore, but I've got to believe he would have played a tad better than he is right now if he was still in his familiar role with the Cubs. Why? He wouldn't have been injured? Why would he have been immune to the "team slumps" the lineup seemed to go through this year? He certainly wasn't last year the few times the lineup went cold.
  5. Sammy Sofa
    I think you're confused about what a "copout" is.
  6. Sammy Sofa
    Wasn't he upfront with how he was struggling early in the year? I don't recall him blaming anyone else for his slow start.
  7. Sammy Sofa
    Oh, if only.
  8. Sammy Sofa
    Wow, nice air.
  9. Sammy Sofa
    My God....the comments posted on that editorial are so cringe-worthy.
  10. Sammy Sofa
    Exactly. Even the people that would prefer Bradley remaining here agree that he's a jackass. We get it. He's also a better player than whatever the alternative is, whether that be an in-house option or Chone Figgins. Pretty much. It's about as far as we can get from an ideal situation, but I'd much rather have him and his baggage and his production than downgrading an already shaky lineup and eating salary with the team seemingly strapped for cash for the forseeable future.
  11. Sammy Sofa
    Leaving Gregg in as long as he did and now PHing Miles in this spot makes it abundantly clear that Lou simply does not give a [expletive].
  12. Sammy Sofa
    No, never. Not even for a second.
  13. Sammy Sofa
    How? How does it effect the game if they don't like Bradley? How is Bradley impacting any of these players when they go up to bat or are making a play in the field or pitching the ball? He's not: that's simply not realistic at all. You're either saying the players are so weak-minded that they can't produce because they're constantly thinking about a guy who has absolutely nothing to do with them at that moment or they're so petty they're essentially willfully focusing on Bradley over the game. Again, I'm not saying Bradley's a jerk, but I want to know how people know or think that his attitude is actually impacting the play of the other players or the outcomes of the games.
  14. Sammy Sofa
    How is it "outweighing" his production? How is it not "outweighing" his production? Reality? The perceptions of the fans should not dictate the removal of a useful player just because he's a jerk. There's absolutely nothing that shows that his behavior or attitude has been detrimental to the team's play.
  15. Sammy Sofa
    How is it "outweighing" his production?
  16. Sammy Sofa
    Still don't know how that actually causes the Cubs to lose over, say, Aramis missing a ton of time, Soriano playing hurt and being ineffectual except for two months, the Miles/Fontenot combo somehow being even worse than the worst case scenario and Soto having a horrendous sophomore slump likely (and hopefully) due to nagging injuries, weight gain and the WBC. Bradley's attitude is pretty far down the list in terms of reasons for this letdown of a season, especially coupled with how productive he's been for most of the year. Bradley's a pain in the ass, but anyone thinking his attitude is more detrimental than all of that simply is not being realistic.
  17. Sammy Sofa
    Well, if you had a pain in the ass working with you everyday that complained all of the time and was extremely negative would it impact your co-workers performance? If they sucked already, maybe. I sincerely hope the other Cubs' tears don't stain their Lisa Frank sticker-covered Trapper Keepers.
  18. Sammy Sofa
    Distraction for who? People honestly think his comments or behavior are impacting the performances of the other players?
  19. Sammy Sofa
    The logical thing would he's back next year plugged into the #2 spot. He's shown he can perform with the fans hating him, so who gives a crap what they think? It's not like a significant number are going to stop buying tickets or merchandise because of Milton Bradley. There's simply not an actual need to trade him.
  20. Sammy Sofa
    I think he means right now, Soriano is done for the year and Bradley is always in flux, so the spot spots are "up for grabs" for the remainder of the year. This is true. Though Fox has been horrendous in the OF, so if they do intend on trading him it's not necessarily the best idea to have him out there looking bad coupled with his decline at the plate. Not that this is going to let the Cubs pull a fast one. Whatever, Fox isn't that good and Lou is an idiot. It's a perfect storm of suck either way.
  21. Sammy Sofa
    Both corner OF spots are "up for grabs?" What, is Soriano somehow getting traded before next season?
  22. Sammy Sofa
    Is this his last year in Chicago? I have to believe that it is. This upcoming offseason is going to make the last offseason look like the best thing ever.
  23. Sammy Sofa
    No, never. In the last decade it's been Cubs and Cardinals only. Twasn't the question. 'Tis also a shittay division in that time, so that shouldn't be surprise.
  24. Sammy Sofa
    DeRosa at his age and with his wrist will be happy to consider anyone dumb enough to pay him.
  25. Sammy Sofa
    The most frustrating thing about that article is that it made me think yet again about what maybe could have been if he had batted mostly RH this season.
×
×
  • Create New...