So on your list of strawmen you've got people attacking guys like Telander to try and take the heat off of guys like McGwire, then people arguing that McGwire and now that people have to have "superior credentials" to question someone like Telander? That's absurd. I don't have to be a "superior" sports journalist or even a sports journalist to do that. Again, explain to me how you justify Telander not touching this before 2000. Was it too well hidden? Did he ignore it? Do you really think he had no clue or couldn't have "uncovered" decades' worth of PED use if he had looked into it even halfheartedly? Hasn't it become apparent by now that this wasn't some secret activity by a small group of individuals? Coaches were involved, trainers were involved, doctors were involved and everyone was going back and forth between them and reccomended who to go to and what to use and so on. This was an open secret AT BEST. You REALLY think that it would have required some kind of serious investigation or detective work to figure this out? It's not like people were being subtle, leaving PED's and evidence thereof around the clubhouses and locker rooms. A sports journalist would have to have been blind and deaf, or perhaps just willfully so, to have NO idea that anything was going on for as long as it did. But please, "defend" Telander again in this ignorance by listing his credentials. Explain how that resume excuses him having no idea this was going on or choosing to ignore it, because it seems like either he, like scores of others, chose to not press the issue or was just ridiculously incompetent at his job. Which is it? I suppose you must be the biggest Hendry defender on the board, too. I mean, how could you tolerate all of these people here critcizing him? What are their general managing credentials?