Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,022
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Well, that's not a fact. That's just, like, your opinion, man.
  2. Maybe WSR is the kiss of death for these prospects. Colvin's days are numbered.
  3. that's not really true. his xFIP's with the twins were 4.45, 3.94, 4.81 and 4.54. he was pretty close to league average in 2004 and 2007, above average in 2005 and below average in 2006. it wasn't until he got to seattle that he became truly terrible. It's mainly those WHIPs scaring the crap out of me.
  4. Thank God. Our long national nightmare is finally over. I hope he beats the holy [expletive] out of everyone else in it.
  5. I agree. It has been firmly established that at least 50% of the 90's list are not good Best Pictures.
  6. This is very debatable. Yeah, it would be fantastic if Silva somehow figured things out, but it just doesn't seem very likely given his age, the type of pitcher he is and his lack of success in the majors to this point. He's really only got one year where he wasn't terrible, and it's not like that one year sticks out as some impressive feat of what could be (he pitched about 6 games fewer than his other full seasons, and his last couple games that year he was horrendous, so so who knows how that year would look with at least 5-6 more starts). Yes, it would be great if he could get back to those 2005 levels. It's just very unlikely.
  7. STOP BEING SO NEGATIVE, MAN.
  8. Actually I expect people to offer something more then the above. But at least I don't embarrass myself like you so often do and have done in this thread. Why are you so Angry? Do you need a hug? This is getting creepy. I'm also not sure how I "embarassed" myself in this thread simply because I don't agree with your declaration that all of the movies that won Best Picture in the 90's are better than the ones that did in the 00's.
  9. I said why I don't think they belong on the list in terms of arguing how the films in the 90's were so much better. To me both films are ridiculously over the top and basically little more than silly cartoons in their respective genres. Both are entertaining and, like I said, I don't think they're bad films, but I don't see how they prove that movies were better in the 90's. One relies on an absurd, comic book-esque super villain who's just an excuse for Hopkins to chew the scenery like someone starving to death and the other has the emotional depth of a Hallmark Card. Of course a ton of people are going to love movies like that. It doesn't actually make them great. Unclench and stop expecting people to agree with you, you freak. You really think everyone is going to agree when you basically say something like how Driving Miss Daisy is "arguably better than most, if not all, of the films of the '00."
  10. I confused myself with my own rage and bile.
  11. Who said he'd be better than either of those guys? And you do realize that the things you're harping on are taught in the minors, right? Do you actually think guys have no idea how to do things like drag bunt or shorten their swing until they encounter a hitting coach in the majors? What the [expletive] do you think a hitting coach in the majors does?
  12. Silence of the Lambs simply is not a great film. It's not bad, but it's pretty ridiculous and cartoon-y. Hell, I'd describe Forrest Gump the same way.
  13. And I'd prefer Byrd hitting second.
  14. If Soriano and Soto bounce back I assume they'll move up in the lineup since keeping them behind Byrd at that point would be beyond moronic.
  15. What the [expletive] are you babbling about? Pujols in Sept./Oct.: .357 .440 .616 1.056 Pujols in August: .319 .443 .649 1.092 If they ended up trading Pujols it's not going to be only for a vastly overrated and hugely flawed slugger whose contract is up at the same time.
  16. Half of that 90's list is pretty embarassing, too.
  17. Your assesment of McGwire as a hitter never fails to be hilariously wrong.
  18. Truly tragic. We should all salute the bravery of Fernando Perez.
  19. Haw-haw! Z got lumped in with the scrubs and shipped off.
  20. They don't have to do such a thing, but there's pretty much no chance they would trade Theriot and not callup Castro. I know, and it's annoying. The more things change...
  21. I don't understand why it's often approached on this board like the Cubs must bring Castro up if Theriot is traded. Why can't they trade Theriot and keep Castro in the minors? I'd happily take starting a combo of Blanco/Barney if it meant getting a good return for Theriot (ideally prospect(s)). It's not like they can't eat the crappy production from SS if it means building for the future. This isn't exactly a team that peple are expecting great things from.
  22. It was either Frey or the steroids.
  23. Howard's contract is up at the same time as Pujols. Howard for Pujols is just silly. Then this is even more ridiculous. ESPN...feh.
  24. RBI single for Castro with his 2nd AB.
  25. Why would the Cards do this? The only reasoning I can think of is that some kind of understanding has already been established between the organization and Pujols as to what he's going to want to re-sign with them and they're simply not going to pay it, even though that seems ridiculous given what he means to that team. How long is Howard signed for? How does this make any sense?
×
×
  • Create New...