He's still an extreme outlier. It's simply not realistic to expect most players to be anywhere near the type of player that Pujols is, so why not point to the legion of other players that perform multiple roles well, or at least serviceably? Pujols is basically a freak, so comparing other players to him is pretty pointless, plus players like Howard and Dunn have shown time and time again how extremely valuable they can be, so why dismiss them as if they're something young players should actively avoid becoming if their strengths ultimately show them to be that type of player? Some players simply have obvious strengths and glaring weaknesses instead of being "balanced" players, and Sandberg's rhetoric often times sounds like he wants to essentially "force it" if a player isn't one of those all-around workhorses.