Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. I only want Quade leaning towards having an answer if his answers are "Fukudome, Fukudome and SP."
  2. ... They haven't played a single ST game yet.
  3. God damn; Quade is like something out of a fevered nightmare. Castro cares even less about his photo than his defense: http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/1f/fullj.88ab349172d1fa5d7dd1bf291f472d94/88ab349172d1fa5d7dd1bf291f472d94-getty-108039184es108_chicago_cubs.jpg Wood is apparently running for president: http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/6b/fullj.61d4fdbb2026e3782539dd2a32755dc1/61d4fdbb2026e3782539dd2a32755dc1-getty-108039184es089_chicago_cubs.jpg
  4. He's the best that KNOWS HOW TO WIN. Teixeira and Gonzalez majored in losing.
  5. We need a ruling: is this more or less negative a message than choosing to use a position player as a reliever instead of a starting pitcher after the bullpen is depleted?
  6. "Unhip?" Most teams wisely lock up any young, good 3B they have for a long, long time.
  7. Man, if you can motivate someone to [expletive] in your spot then I don't feel sorry for you at all. You have to REALLY piss people off to inspire that kind of response.
  8. I love this man so very much.
  9. Dusty is Michael Scott.
  10. You two are adorable.
  11. because he got drilled by the [expletive] pirates, not because dusty was being responsible. Yeah, you really think Dusty would have taken Harang out after 73 pitches if he had only allowed a run on four hits through six innings? [expletive] no. What kind of message would that send?
  12. That doesn't make it correct.
  13. Are you saying that you would actually prefer Zambrano or Garza? No it doesn't matter to me. WHOA, NOW YOU'RE TALKING CRAZY. Messages must be sent.
  14. Man, you are all about messages.
  15. What the [expletive] is wrong with you? seeing a second basemen pitch in a game we're willing to effectively forfeit is sufficiently fun to risk having a moron like Baker use a SP in the 15th inning after almost every fan has gone to sleep? i'm trying to reconcile all of this. What is there to reconcile? Who here is talking about just giving up on a game once it hits a certain number of innings besides you? Those of us talking about effectively forfeiting game are talking about preferring the Cubs to do that if it's essentially a meaningless game and the bullpen has been used up, not just "oh, it's the 14th inning and we still have a couple of relievers left...let's pack it in!!!"
  16. Oh, right, because it'll just be a typical "extra inning game" and not an 18 inning monstrosity where Quade has depleted the bullpen when people are "screaming for the Cubs to give up;" what a silly, stupid thing to say. Yes, unless it's a critical game I'll almost always prefer that the Cubs effectively pack it in if it's tied and there's nobody left in the bullpen. That's almost always a much better option than trying to squeeze relief work out of a starter.
  17. Sure it is. Why are you going to risk so much more over a single game that has virtually no meaning in the big picture? If you're such a shitty manager that you've used up your bullpen options, well, sometimes you just have to effectively toss it in when the game is going twice as long as usual. That's as no-brainer as it gets. Though you probably think Votto should have dropped a sick bunt bro at some point, so what the [expletive] do you know?
  18. I did. UPDATE: he was not receptive http://www.csnchicago.com/sportsnetChicago/thumbnails/Sportsnet_-_Chicago/14/577/CTL_promo_2-15.jpg http://www.csnchicago.com/sportsnetChicago/thumbnails/Sportsnet_-_Chicago/14/577/CTL_promo_2-15.jpghttp://www.csnchicago.com/sportsnetChicago/thumbnails/Sportsnet_-_Chicago/14/577/CTL_promo_2-15.jpg http://www.csnchicago.com/sportsnetChicago/thumbnails/Sportsnet_-_Chicago/14/577/CTL_promo_2-15.jpg
  19. Yeah, bust your brains on that one, "Dusty bashers."
  20. Definitely not. They should obviously be listening to deals for Byrd, but it might be in there best interests to keep him through his final year. I really don't think Colvin is going to be good enough to justify him being the regular RF, especially with Soriano's declining production over in LF. Who are going to be FA outfielders after 2011?
  21. Why the ? at 2B? Unless he tanks isn't it pretty much a given that it would be DeWitt there in 2012 in that scenario?
×
×
  • Create New...