Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    98,030

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Sammy Sofa
    There's always someone out there who inexplicably gets all sweaty and flushed when they see a successful drag bunt.
  2. Sammy Sofa
    I had completely forgotten just how bad Guillen was. For some reason I thought he was a decent player. grit doesnt age well edit: I should post this in another thread, but Ozzie never got along with Big Frank because Frank didn't hustle. Amazingly a large portion of Sox fans sided with Ozzie on this and thought he was an important player of some of their good mid 90s teams Yup. He's still got that reputation, too.
  3. Sammy Sofa
    Oh I agree, I'm just saying there's plenty of examples of players that would benefit their game by learning how to lay down a damn bunt when asked to. Like who?
  4. Sammy Sofa
    I'm "arguing" that bemoaning Gorzelanny not being on the team is largely irrelevant when it comes to the situation they're in this season. Yes, having Gorzelanny as a 6th starter would have been a viable backup plan when one is planning for the season on paper. No, having Gorzelanny as the 6th pitcher this season wouldn't have made much of an actual difference this season. If someone can convincingly argue that holding on to Gorzelanny would have resulted in the Cubs not being at least 12 games under .500 at this point, I'm all ears. And that leads to the crux of my point, is that it wasn't like it was Gorzelanny or bust when it came to dealing with 2 starters going down so early. Most of the time a team will stumble across an acceptable replacement via retread FA signings or internal options, and the Cubs certainly paraded out a bunch of pitchers where it wasn't unreasonable to assume that at least one could put together a stretch of starts that were tolerable (emphasis on "tolerable," before the usual suspects start flipping out and frothing at the mouth thinking that I'm expecting a bunch of good starts out of garbage) instead of the absolutely catastrophic slew of starts that the Cubs got.
  5. Sammy Sofa
    He looked directly into the camera in a recent interview and it was very unpleasant. Quade on film is always unpleasant.
  6. Sammy Sofa
    There are plenty of players where if they "don't know how to bunt" it doesn't matter at all.
  7. Sammy Sofa
    This is not true. There is a difference between a 'sacrifice fly', a 'sacrifice bunt' and a 'sacrifice hit'. Two are outs and one is a hit. In 1926, the sacrifice fly rule was changed and in 1931, the individual sacrifice fly stat was wiped out until 1954. So a 'sacrifice hit' was a hit when 'The Babe and 'The Iron Horse' played. No. They both fell under the same category until 1954. You're wrong, and common sense makes that abundantly clear. The sac fly/hit has a really weird history, but the numbers you're desperately hoping show that Ruth and Gehrig bunted a lot simply don't do that. http://research.sabr.org/journals/sacrifice-fly
  8. Sammy Sofa
    Hah! Nice.
  9. Sammy Sofa
    MOST OF THOSE WEREN'T BUNTS.
  10. Sammy Sofa
    Right, but if Gorz was not an essential part of the team at the time of the trade, why is he all of a sudden now? Because the team is so bad and people start looking for more things to blame. Gorzelanny goes from being Gorzelanny to the lost salvation given away for nothing. Not at all. Gorzelanny was a nice player for the Cubs and they gave him away for nothing. It didn't make much sense at all at the time and it came back to bite them when they decided to go into the season with no 6th starter and needed two. It's also BS that people keep offering the injury excuse as to why the Cubs suck when the Cubs put themselves in the situation they are in. How did it "bite" them? Oooh, the Cubs MIGHT be 12 or 13 games under .500 instead of 17. Lordy, Lordy, be still my beating heart. And I don't know why you think reality is "BS." The Cubs suck for a number of reasons, and injuries to the starting rotation have played a big part. Still having Gorzelanny would have done little to alleviate that.
  11. Sammy Sofa
    And they were bad because the Cubs didn't go into the season with a viable 6th starter. They still would have been horrific if they had Gorzelanny.
  12. Sammy Sofa
    I can't believe I'm trotting out this cliche, but....even the best hitters fail 7 times out of 10. Yes, bunting is different than swinging away, but people talk about players "knowing how to bunt" like they expect, no, DEMAND that they lay down a successful bunt every single time they attempt to. They talk like since it's something they don't have to do very often they should be able to do it without fail every time they're called on to do it. If that's the case, then don't you expect a starting player to get on base every single time they called on to pinch hit? You get people talking like bunting is some kind of muscle memory activity, where if you practice it enough you can just do it in your sleep and always succeed at laying one down.
  13. Sammy Sofa
    Right, but if Gorz was not an essential part of the team at the time of the trade, why is he all of a sudden now? Because the team is so bad and people start looking for more things to blame. Gorzelanny goes from being Gorzelanny to the lost salvation given away for nothing.
  14. Sammy Sofa
    We aren't paid executives in charge of the decision making. I'm just curious what has changed that took people from thinking it was a great trade at the time to thinking now that it was a terrible trade at the time. If Gorz wasn't the greatly superior option at the time, what has changed to make him clearly that at the time of the trade? They got rid of all the other options as well and had no others. Most people assumed they wouldn't go into the season without a 6th starter. Most people would also assume that all of the in-house and retread options would be as horrific as it turned out. There's bad and then there's 2011 Cubs #4-5 starting pitcher bad.
  15. Sammy Sofa
    In addition to that, up until fairly recently (I just don't remember exactly when) moving a runner from 1st to 2nd and/or 2nd to 3rd with a long fly ball out was scored as a sacrifice fly, too. Yes, I should have clarified this, too. Thanks for that, Fred. Benchwarmer's vision of an often-bunting Ruth or Gehrig is pure fantasy.
  16. Sammy Sofa
    No, stop this discussion right now. I just said sac bunts and sac flies were the same stat until 1954. They were recorded together as a single stat called "sacrifice hits." There's no need to try and breakdown Benchwarmer's inane post...anyone with a functioning brain is going to realize that most of Ruth and Gehrig's "sacrifice hits" were sac flies and not bunts.
  17. Sammy Sofa
    Sacrifice flies and sacrifice bunts were a combined stat until 1954, so if you think most of those "sacrifice hits" for guys like Ruth and Gehrig were bunts then I've got a LOT of things I want to sell to you.
  18. Sammy Sofa
    We aren't paid executives in charge of the decision making. I'm just curious what has changed that took people from thinking it was a great trade at the time to thinking now that it was a terrible trade at the time. If Gorz wasn't the greatly superior option at the time, what has changed to make him clearly that at the time of the trade? The Cubs ended up nearly 20 games under .500 and people get punchy.
  19. Sammy Sofa
    Lazy players swing, because they hate to run and try.
  20. Sammy Sofa
    So was it CubsGM?
  21. Sammy Sofa
    Right. Gorzelanny could have been useful, but I'm sorry, planning for two starters to go down after/during their first starts AND all of their replacements being THAT bad wasn't feasible. Having Gorzelanny wouldn't have magically spared Cashner, and he's only one guy. They'd have won, what, maybe 5 more games because of the guy?
  22. Sammy Sofa
    http://bobbrenlyreallywisheshewasmanaginginsteadofannouncing.org Weird that you demand that I back up my reading between the lines when all you've done is decided out of thin air that Bob Brenly decided to not manage the Cubs because he decided he's too good for them. I'll take that as a 'No'. Brenly has been reported as in the mix for multiple managing spots since 2004 and has come away with nothing each time. If you're really convinced that he was being pursued each time and turned them all down because they weren't the "right fit" then this is pointless, because that's ridiculous. How about the Brewers? Brenly was reported to be after their management spot after both the 2009 and 2010 season. Do you think he turned down offers then, too?
  23. Sammy Sofa
    My gut tells me he hasn't been responding because he's been banned. Whoops, looks like you forgot Benchwarmer.
  24. Sammy Sofa
    Is Buck going to announce the rest of the game like it's a [expletive] funeral because of the cancer "tribute?" Lighten the [expletive] up, you ghoul.
  25. Sammy Sofa
    What's the difference in walks between the top teams and the bottom teams in those leagues?
×
×
  • Create New...