That would be best case scenario. Considering we'd have him for his ages 33-35 seasons, my point is he may well decline from the 3.4 or so WAR player he's been. Even if he declines some, he becomes not close to worth what he'd get. Even if he ages well, he probably will still decline to some degree. If we were getting a 29 or 30 year old Buerhle, I might change my mind. But a 33 year old Buerhle isn't very enticing. So you don't have the same concern about paying Wilson much more than Buehrle for those same 33-35 seasons and beyond? I understand he has more room to fall in order to be average. I also understand that he doesn't have as many pitches on that arm, but he could become a huge burden at the end of his contract. He is going to command a salary that you can't afford to have him fall back a whole lot. The big difference is that Wilson has been a starter for a much shorter period of time than Buerhle. Buerhle has pitched just under 2500 innings (Just over 2000 when he finished up his age 30 season like Wilson is). CJ Wilson has thrown just over 700 innings. There's a LOT less wear and tear on Wilson's body. That said, I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to Buerhle if he could be had for the right price and number of years. He's going to be declining, but some of that might be offset by a switch to the NL.