there is nothing to like in either. valbuena's value? he's cheaper. So what? They're both on the team. Incorrect. Nobody here is a "huge backer of Stewart." There's a huge difference between explaining how you can look at a player/countering hyperbole and being some kind of superfan. I'm wrong all the time; the FO is far from infallable. My point is, and has been, is that arguing whether the Cubs or Rockies "won" between Ian Stewart and Tyler Colvin is nearly meaningless. Now I see what MSG-T was saying when it was like your post was written by two different people; so you DO agree with me? OK, good so far (though saying Colvin and Stewart were similarly "highly regarded" is a HUGE stretch)... ...wait, what? Why wouldn't they see what he can do after his surgery? It's not like they have anyone beating down the door at 3B. Good...point? Man, this was a schizo post.