You are making completely unsubstantiated assumptions here. Since when does a guy making it through a college season as a starter make it obvious he can do it in a major league season? There was nothing obvious about his ability to handle the workload. In 2009 he made 24 starts, but he only averaged less than 4 and a third in those starts, so he was hardly anywhere close to actually handling a full starters workload. You can rack up 100 innings before the all star break in the majors. There were questions both about his ability to be effective in 6+ inning stints, and whether he could actually last for 6 innings every 5 days for 6 months. There were questions about his effectiveness, but there weren't questions in the Cubs' minds about his ability to throw 200 innings. Seriously, why would the Cubs waste 2 years of their first round pick's career trying to build up his inning count if they didn't think he could someday throw 200 innings? If you want to say they were overly cautious, that's fine, but you still haven't shown why they were "reckless" by methodically building up his innings.