I'm not the biggest DiCaro fan but she's getting a lot of [expletive] for nothing on her Twitter feed. She's always been neutral through all of this giving her lawyer POV and (probably) wrongly trusted the accuser's lawyer (not the worst thing in the world) Has she been neutral though? Hasn't she been in favor of them cutting or trading Kane all along?(I'm asking, because she litters my timeline so much in these instances, I don't come close to reading them all) By wanting that(if I'm right on her), doesn't that basically put her on the girls side? Again, not a hockey fan and if this happened to a Cub, I'd hate it and wouldn't know where I'd stand on the player being on the team or not(at this pre trial stage). But if you want the guy off the team, pre trial and before anything is actually known, it seems to me she does have her mind made up. If my thinking is wrong here, I'm more than willing to listen and learn otherwise. Nah, don't think she's ever mentioned cutting him. They were leaning more towards wanting to suspend him for (at least) training camp since it keeps giving him a platform to proclaim his innocence to millions and essentially call her a liar whenever he gets asked a question while she has to stay nameless and quiet. Ah OK, it's shown up in my timeline so much, I thought it was her, since I don't have much else in it that'd talk about hockey. My bad.