ConstableRabbit

Good things come to those who don't masturbate. ETAA: damn, the online feed really is behind.

Well, this will temporarily halt the "we need Lovie and McCown" discussion that will happen at Thanksgiving. ...until the game, anyway.

Slightly better reason than becoming a Steelers fan because of a sandwich. Nono, he made a life for himself in Pittsburgh. That happens from time to time, even if it is a little lame.

Who the [expletive] becomes a Cowboys fan because they met Emmitt Smith on the street once?

John Holmes didn't make very good choices. Let's say Peter North instead. He unloads whether the receiver is paying attention or not.

He misspeaks every other sentence.

David Diehl knows he's disappointed though.

It's a video guy on a lot of teams.

Isn't every player in MLB?

Pretax doe

http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2014/11/17/wrigley-field-rooftop-owners-owe-36m-facing-foreclosure.php

http://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/CPe_cjlsgITsEfi7Y8_PDPalLUI=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn1.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2462822/4_-_njhwspG.0.gif

[expletive] that.

It was glorious. over two touchdowns. A winning streak that dates back to 1995.

Pretty standard stuff for the most part but I really liked his response about whether he needs to be a traditional "disciplinarian" in order for his team to be fundamentally sound. Unsurprisingly, he doesn't think so.

-1000 for writing "Hamel"

http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/marlins-giancarlo-stanton-discussing-record-breaking-300-million-deal-111314 That would wreck that franchise from being able to do anything productive unless they just decide to open up the pocketbook and start being a $150 million payroll team. Stanton probably knows better, and has said as much. I believe he's been quoted as saying "3 months doesn't change 3 years" or something in regards to the progress they've made this season when someone asked if he was interested in signing an extension. He's witnessed first hand them opening up the bank only to shut it immediately. The Marlins are cheap, and if they're paying one man $30 million a year, that will likely be half their payroll. Ideally it should come down to whether or not he wants to be on a club that's built for success, because he knows he'll get a monster contract from someone eventually, but that's a [expletive] load of money to turn away. I hope he knows if he accepts it he might as well accept that he'll spend the majority of that contract not winning baseball games. They might have some success coming up with their young players and what not, but the Marlins won't be able to retain them because Stanton is going to be costing them so much money in the first place. It's just going to be a revolving door of talent that never stays consistent. Unless they decide "Hey we want to be a real team now" and open up the bank and leave it open. I'm sure that's what they're telling him to convince him to sign, and maybe they're honest this time, but history provides enough proof that that isn't true and his instinct is probably calling [expletive] on that. If he turns down 300 million guaranteed [expletive] dollars he's a moron.

That's my plan.

Guys, what would it take to acquire Heyward?

No, still frowned upon by the moral police of this board. Are you kidding? Have you seen imb's cardinals in hell collage? Which now can be updated, BTW.

lmfao

He and Marshall are supposedly still taking turns on it, but it's been a few weeks since Cutler was on it. This week was Marshall's "turn". Makes sense -- I couldn't seem to find this week's. It's too bad, too. Would have liked to hear what he had to say after Sunday's bloodbath.

Is Jay still doing his weekly radio show?

Absolutely.