i wasn't arguing with you in that post. my comment didn't quote you, didn't follow yours, didn't mention you by name. i merely threw their projections into the discussion, despite my skepticism of Hill's line, which i explained. all of my opinions are objective. what you're saying makes for a stupid argument. "he's a good baseball player for reason A, B & C" "that guy sucks." "oh, i guess i overlooked something. better go see where i'm wrong." "my work here is done." that's lazy and presumptuous.