The Committee on Infractions (allegedly an independent entity that is separate from the NCAA) has got to be uncomfortable with all of this. Are they going to dismantle an entire football program, deprive a public institution of up to 18 million dollars in revenue, and affect the livelihoods of multiple individuals simply because of the inconsistent and totally uncorroborated immunity testimony of one player from a rival school? That's a terrifying precedent to set. You can be sure that schools like Ohio State, Michigan, Bama, and Auburn absolutely do not want that to become a thing. Michigan has zero composite top-100 recruits in their current class and OSU has 11 broader oversight and harsher penalties is something i suspect they'd welcome