i mostly like the idea and i'd love to see it played out, but the time for that would have been the seasons where we didn't care much if we lost 90 games, rather than conduct a grand experiment that could easily single-handedly torpedo a season the obvious significant drawback is the outcry when a pitcher underperforms or sustains an injury; those things happen with great regularity, but if you're following conventional routines you escape any perceived culpability in those outcomes to my first point, it's another personal frustration in the Javy Baez entrenchment: if he doesn't hold much trade value then we should really have been targeting more similarly-flawed upside prospects in the 90-loss seasons with little to lose, and if he still does hold significant value, let another team currently in that same position deal with fixing him, especially when time & time again we've shown hopelessly incapable of curing broken swings (Jackson, Olt, Lake, Vitters)