:shock: Crawford is a WHOLE lot better than CPat. From an offensive standpoint, Crawford is to Patterson, as Miguel Tejada is to Neifi. Three year splits: Crawford: 1900 ABs, 556 H, 77 2B, 43 3B, 31 HR, 190 RBI, 88 BB, 7 HBP, 267 K, 160 SB, 33 CS, .293/.324/.427/.751 Patterson: 1411 ABs, 363 H, 65 2B, 16 3B, 50 HR, 161 RBI, 83 BB, 7 HBP, 363 K, 63 SB, 19 CS, .257/.301/.432/.733 You could also make the argument that Dusty does not run as much with CPatt as Uncle Lou ran with Crawford, but I'll leave that to your own judgment. Like I said, given the price, keeping Corey would have been a better option than trading for Crawford, especially given his likely price tag. Plus, Crawford posting that kind of output in LF (given his price) would just be bad. I don't know that using the three year splits is fair in this case, as Crawford has only had 3 complete MLB seasons due to age (and he's progressed each season). Crawford put up better numbers at 22 and 23 years of age. CPat had Crawford by 40 OPS points at 24 (when he was injured and didn't get to finish the season...who knows if he would have regressed). Crawford has always had a much better SB ratio than CPat. I don't want Crawford either as we're already looking at one of the weakest SLG OF we've ever had. I'd take him over Jones, but that's not going to happen.